UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended August 31, 2012

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 For the transition period from _______to _______

Commission File Number: 333-132456

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

1101 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, 6th Floor
Washington, DC 20004
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number including area code: 202-538-1677

N/A
Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X]                                             No [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [X]                                                No [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [   ]                                                No [X]

As of September 10, 2012, the Company had 29,645,552 issued and outstanding shares of common stock

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)

INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AUGUST 31, 2012

(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Interim Balance Sheets
As at August 31, 2012 and November 30, 2011
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)

See condensed notes to interim financial statements.

1

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Interim Statements of Operations and Comprehensive loss
For the Three months and Nine Months Ended August 31, 2012 and August 31, 2011 and the Period from Inception
(March 1, 2005) to August 31, 2012
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

See condensed notes to interim financial statements.

2

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Interim Statements of Cash Flows
For the Nine Months Ended August 31, 2012 and August 31, 2011 and the Period from Inception (March 1, 2005) to August 31, 2012
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

* Excludes the credit of $35,160 to accrued liability resulting from deferred financing (a non cash item)

* Excludes the conversion of $411,828 face value Convertible debentures along with accrued interest for $33,423 into 1,484,169 common shares

See condensed notes to interim financial statements.

3

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Interim Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit
For the period from inception (March 1, 2005) to August 31, 2012.
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

See condensed notes to interim financial statements.

4

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements
August 31, 2012
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

5

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements
August 31, 2012
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

6

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements
August 31, 2012
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

    50,000,000 Common shares, $0.001 par value
And
    5,000,000 Preferred shares, $0.001 par value

The Company’s Articles of Incorporation authorize its Board of Directors to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The provisions in the Articles of Incorporation relating to the preferred stock allow the directors to issue preferred stock with multiple votes per share and dividend rights, which would have priority over any dividends paid with respect to the holders of the Company’s common stock.

29,645,552 Common shares, $0.001 par value

7

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements
August 31, 2012
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

Year ended November 30, 2011

During the year the Company issued 800,000 shares of common stock to private investors at a price of $0.20 per share. In addition, the Company allotted 150,000 common shares to a subscriber who had subscribed for common shares at $0.20 per share in the prior year. The shares of common stock are restricted securities, as that term is defined in Rule 144 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company relied upon the exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with the sale of these securities.

Nine months ended August 31, 2012

The Company issued 1,484,169 common shares for conversion of convertible debentures having face value of $411,828 (Convertible debenture 2) and accrued interest of $33,423. The total debt for $445,251 was converted into 1,484,169 common shares at $0.30 per share.

The Company issued 1,333,333 shares of common stock to private investors at a price of $0.30 per share for a total consideration of $400,000. The shares of common stock are restricted securities, as that term is defined in Rule 144 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company relied upon the exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with the sale of these securities.

8

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements
August 31, 2012
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

Year ended November 30, 2011

The Company did not issue any options during the year ended November 30, 2011.

Nine months ended August 31, 2012

On January 4, 2012, the board of directors granted options to three directors to acquire a total of 775,000 common shares, one officer to acquire 20,000 common shares and two consultants to acquire a total of 110,000 common shares. The 905,000 options were issued at an exercise price of $0.13 per share and vest immediately with an expiry term of four years. The fair value of each option used for the purpose of estimating the stock compensation is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

On September 19, 2012 the board of directors approved the cancellation of all the 905,000 options issued on January 4, 2012, as detailed above and to be exchanged into 905,000 warrants on terms identical to the terms of the existing stock options in the Company. This is conditional and to be effective when the holder agrees to the cancellation and exchange in the form acceptable to the Company (see Note 12)

9

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements
August 31, 2012
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

On January 4, 2012, the board of directors issued warrants to a Company in which the Chief Operating officer has an interest in, to acquire a total of 800,000 common shares. These warrants were issued at an exercise price of $0.13 per share with an expiry term of four years. The Company expensed stock based compensation cost of $100,148. The fair value of each warrant used for the purpose of estimating the compensation expense is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

On March 13, 2012, all of the issued and outstanding stock options for common shares in the Company’s capital stock previously issued to Elad, Ilan Shalev and Haim Danon (being principals of Elad) were exchanged into warrants on terms identical to the terms of the existing stock options in the Company. The Company thus cancelled 850,000 options having an exercise price of $0.25 per common share and expiring on June 30, 2014 and issued 850,000 warrants at exercise price of $0.25 per common share and expiring June 30, 2014.

On August 9, 2012, the board of directors issued warrants to a Company owned and controlled by a director, to acquire a total of 400,000 common shares. These warrants were issued at an exercise price of $0.20 per share with an expiry term of four years. The Company expensed stock based compensation cost of $75,013. The fair value of each warrant used for the purpose of estimating the compensation expense is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

10

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements
August 31, 2012
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

a) Consulting agreements:

The directors of the Company executed consulting agreement with the Company on the following terms:

Agreement with a director to pay compensation for $5,000 per month. The agreement expired August 30, 2012

Agreement with a director to pay compensation for $7,000 per month. The agreement expires December 31, 2012.

Agreement with the Chief Executive Officer to pay compensation for $12,000 per month plus a car allowance for $600 per month. The agreement expires December 31, 2016. The monthly remuneration will increase with accomplishment of milestones.

Effective December 1, 2011, SDI executed an agreement with a Company in which the Chief Operating Officer has an interest in, for a period of ten months which expires September 30, 2012 for services rendered. The total consulting fees are estimated at $200,000 for the ten month period. The Company has expensed $151,600 for the nine month period ended August 31, 2012. The Company may also accept common shares at $0.25 per common share in lieu of cash. As of August 31, 2012, the Company has not exercised its right to accept this compensation in shares.

11

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements
August 31, 2012
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

b) The Company has commitments for leasing office premises in Oakville, Ontario, Canada to September 30, 2012 at a monthly rent (excluding proportionate realty and maintenance costs and taxes) of Canadian $2,500 per month.

The carrying values of the Company’s convertible debentures consist of the following as of August 31, 2012:

$100,000 Face Value Convertible Debenture

On March 23, 2011, the Company issued a $100,000 face value Convertible Debenture, due March 23, 2012 (“Convertible Debenture 1”), to an investor (“Investor”) for net proceeds of $100,000. The debenture accrues interest at 10% per annum. Both principal and interest are payable at maturity. However, the principal amount, plus accrued interest, may be converted into common stock at the option of the Investor at any time during the term to maturity at a conversion price of $0.20 per share, subject to adjustment solely for capital reorganization events. The debenture also embodies certain traditional default provisions that are linked to credit or interest risks, such as bankruptcy proceedings, liquidation events and corporate existence. In the event the Company enters into a Subsequent Financing (an offering of no less than $3,000,000) that occurs prior to the Maturity Date, the debenture will automatically convert at a conversion price per share equal to $0.20 (subject to adjustment for stock splits, recapitalizations or similar events) immediately prior to the closing of the Financing. In addition to any principal payment made at maturity or any prepayment of principal, the Company is required to issue as an additional capital payment common stock equal to 20% of the principal amount paid or payable divided by the then applicable Conversion price. The company did not convert the convertible debenture on maturity and is accruing interest.

12

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements
August 31, 2012
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

$46,500 Face Value Convertible Debenture

On April 14, 2011, the Company issued a $46,500 face value Convertible debenture, due April 14, 2012 (“Convertible Debenture 3”), to an investor (“Investor”) for net proceeds of $46,500. The Debenture accrues interest at 10% per annum. Both principal and interest are payable at maturity. However, the principal amount, plus accrued interest, may be converted into common stock at the option of the Investor at any time during the term to maturity at a conversion price of $0.20 per share, subject to adjustment solely for capital reorganization events. The debenture also embodies certain traditional default provisions that are linked to credit or interest risks, such as bankruptcy proceedings, liquidation events and corporate existence. In the event the Company enters into a Subsequent Financing (an offering of no less than $3,000,000) that occurs prior to the Maturity Date, the debenture will automatically convert at a conversion price per share equal to $0.20 (subject to adjustment for stock splits, recapitalizations or similar events) immediately prior to the closing of the Financing. In addition to any principal payment made at maturity or any prepayment of principal, the Company is required to issue as an additional capital payment common stock equal to 20% of the principal amount paid or payable divided by the then applicable Conversion price. The company did not convert the convertible debenture on maturity and is accruing interest.

$320,000 Face Value Convertible Debenture

During the year ended November 30, 2011 the Company issued $731,828 face value Convertible debentures, due June 30 2014 (“Convertible Debentures 2”), to various investors (“Investors”) for net proceeds of $731,828. The Debenture accrues interest at 8% per annum. The principal is payable at maturity whereas the interest is payable annually in arrears on each anniversary of the issuance date. The principal may be converted in multiples of $1,000 into common stock at the option of the Investor at any time during the term to maturity. The conversion prices are (i) $0.30 on or before the first anniversary of the debenture; (ii) $0.35 on or before the second anniversary of the debenture; and (iii) $0.40 after the second anniversary of the issuance of the debenture and maturity. The conversion prices are subject to adjustment solely for capital reorganization events.

During the quarter ended August 31, 2012, $411,828 face value Convertible debentures along with accrued interest for $33,423 were converted into 1,484,169 common shares at $0.30 per share, leaving a balance of $320,000 face value Convertible debentures (“Convertible Debentures 2”) on August 31, 2012.

The debenture provides down-round protection to the Investor in the event the Company issues rights, options or warrants to all or substantially all the holders of the Common Shares pursuant to which those holders are entitled to subscribe for, purchase or otherwise acquire Common Shares or Convertible Securities within a period of 45 days from the date of issue (the “Rights Period”) at a price, or at a conversion price, of less than 90% of the Current Market Price at the record date for such distribution (any such issuance being a “Rights Offering” and Common Shares that may be acquired in exercise of the Rights Offering, or upon conversion of the Convertible Securities offered by the Rights Offering, being the “Offered Shares”). The debenture also embodies certain traditional default provisions that are linked to credit or interest risks, such as bankruptcy proceedings, liquidation events and corporate existence. In the event of a reorganization, consolidation, merger, or a sale of all or substantially all of the assets, the Company has the option to redeem the debenture at (i) $1,250 per $1,000 of Principal Sum, if occurring on or before the first anniversary of issuance; (ii) $1,125 per $1,000 of Principal Sum if occurring after the first anniversary and prior to the second anniversary of issuance; and (iii) $1,050 per $1,000 of Principal Sum if occurring after the second anniversary of issuance and prior to the end of the term.

13

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements
August 31, 2012
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

$670,000 Face Value Convertible Debenture

During the nine month period ended August 31, 2012 the Company issued $670,000 face value Convertible debentures, due January 16, 2012 (“Convertible Debentures 4”), to various investors (“Investors”) for net proceeds of $670,000. The Debenture accrues interest at 8% per annum. The principal is payable at maturity whereas the interest is payable annually in arrears on each anniversary of the issuance date. The principal may be converted in multiples of $1,000 into common stock at the option of the Investor at any time during the term to maturity. The conversion prices are (i) $0.30 on or before the first anniversary of the debenture; (ii) $0.35 on or before the second anniversary of the debenture; and (iii) $0.40 after the second anniversary of the issuance of the debenture and maturity. The conversion prices are subject to adjustment solely for capital reorganization events.

The debenture provides down-round protection to the Investor in the event the Company issues rights, options or warrants to all or substantially all the holders of the Common Shares pursuant to which those holders are entitled to subscribe for, purchase or otherwise acquire Common Shares or Convertible Securities within a period of 45 days from the date of issue (the “Rights Period”) at a price, or at a conversion price, of less than 90% of the Current Market Price at the record date for such distribution (any such issuance being a “Rights Offering” and Common Shares that may be acquired in exercise of the Rights Offering, or upon conversion of the Convertible Securities offered by the Rights Offering, being the “Offered Shares”). The debenture also embodies certain traditional default provisions that are linked to credit or interest risks, such as bankruptcy proceedings, liquidation events and corporate existence. In the event of a reorganization, consolidation, merger, or a sale of all or substantially all of the assets, the Company has the option to redeem the debenture at (i) $1,250 per $1,000 of Principal Sum, if occurring on or before the first anniversary of issuance; (ii) $1,125 per $1,000 of Principal Sum if occurring after the first anniversary and prior to the second anniversary of issuance; and (iii) $1,050 per $1,000 of Principal Sum if occurring after the second anniversary of issuance and prior to the end of the term.

$240,000 Face Value Convertible Debenture

During the quarter ended February 29, 2012 the Company issued $240,000 face value Convertible debentures, due January 16, 2012 (“Convertible Debentures 5”), to various investors (“Investors”) for net proceeds of $240,000. The Debenture accrues interest at 8% per annum. The principal is payable at maturity whereas the interest is payable annually in arrears on each anniversary of the issuance date. The principal may be converted in multiples of $1,000 into common stock at the option of the Investor at any time during the term to maturity. The conversion prices are (i) $0.30 on or before the first anniversary of the debenture; (ii) $0.35 on or before the second anniversary of the debenture; and (iii) $0.40 after the second anniversary of the issuance of the debenture and maturity. The conversion prices are subject to adjustment solely for capital reorganization events.

The debenture provides down-round protection to the Investor in the event the Company issues rights, options or warrants to all or substantially all the holders of the Common Shares pursuant to which those holders are entitled to subscribe for, purchase or otherwise acquire Common Shares or Convertible Securities within a period of 45 days from the date of issue (the “Rights Period”) at a price, or at a conversion price, of less than 90% of the Current Market Price at the record date for such distribution (any such issuance being a “Rights Offering” and Common Shares that may be acquired in exercise of the Rights Offering, or upon conversion of the Convertible Securities offered by the Rights Offering, being the “Offered Shares”).

14

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements
August 31, 2012
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

The debenture also embodies certain traditional default provisions that are linked to credit or interest risks, such as bankruptcy proceedings, liquidation events and corporate existence. In the event of a reorganization, consolidation, merger, or a sale of all or substantially all of the assets, the Company has the option to redeem the debenture at (i) $1,250 per $1,000 of Principal Sum, if occurring on or before the first anniversary of issuance; (ii) $1,125 per $1,000 of Principal Sum if occurring after the first anniversary and prior to the second anniversary of issuance; and (iii) $1,050 per $1,000 of Principal Sum if occurring after the second anniversary of issuance and prior to the end of the term.

Accounting for the Financings:

The Company has evaluated the terms and conditions of the convertible debentures under the guidance of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The conversion features meet the definition of conventional convertible for purposes of applying the conventional convertible exemption. The definition of conventional contemplates a limitation on the number of shares issuable under the arrangement. In the case of Convertible Debenture 1 and Convertible Debenture 3, the instrument is convertible into a fixed number of shares and there are no down round protection features contained in the contracts. In the case of Convertible Debentures 2, 4 and 5 the instrument is convertible into a fixed number of shares. Although this instrument contains a down-round protection feature, it was determined to be insignificant and did not preclude characterization as conventional convertible. Since the Convertible Debentures achieved the conventional convertible exemption, the Company was required to consider whether the hybrid contracts embody a beneficial conversion feature. In the case of Convertible Debenture 1, 3 and 5 the calculation of the effective conversion amount resulted in a beneficial conversion feature. However, in the case of Convertible Debentures 2 and 4 the calculation of the effective conversion amount did not result in a beneficial conversion feature. At inception, the Company recorded a beneficial conversion feature for Convertible Debenture 1, 3 and 5 as a component of stockholder’s equity.

The automatic conversion provision embedded in Convertible Debenture 1 and 3 and the optional redemption feature embedded in Convertible Debentures 2, 4 and 5 were not considered clearly and closely related to the host debt instrument. The Company analyzed the down-round protection feature, which expires 45 days from the inception date of the financing. The Company determined that there were no contemplated financings during this time period that would trigger the down-round protection feature. Given the feature’s short-term nature and the unlikelihood of a triggering event occurring, the down-round protection feature was deemed immaterial at inception and thus does not require bifurcation and liability classification.

The purchase price allocation for Convertible Debenture 1, 3 and 5 resulted in a debt discount of $20,000, $9,300 and $50,000 respectively. The discount on the debenture will be amortized through periodic charges to interest expense over the term of the debenture using the effective interest method. Amortization of debt discount amounted to $19,256 during the nine month period ended August 31, 2012.

15

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements
August 31, 2012
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

The Company is required to issue common stock as an additional capital payment to any principal payment made on the Convertible Debenture 1 and Convertible Debenture 3. The Company has recorded this commitment as a liability in the amount of $35,160. The offsetting charge is to deferred financing costs. The deferred financing costs will be amortized through periodic charges to interest expense over the term of the debenture using the straight-line method. Amortization of deferred financing costs amounted to $10,916 during the nine month period ended August 31, 2012 ($15,478 for nine months ended August 31, 2011). Unamortized deferred financing costs as at August 31, 2012 is $nil (November 30, 2011- $10,916)

On November 30, 2009, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with its former research and development services contractor Elad Engineering Ltd. (“Elad’) to settle their liability. On March 13, 2012, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with Elad to settle the accounts payable. Elad had previously performed services for the development of a less-than-lethal-electric-projectile and blunt impact projectile. At the date of the settlement agreement, the Company owed Elad $315,143.The Company and Elad agreed to irrevocably waive and release each other from any claim, demand or action in connection with services provided, upon payment of $100,000 by the Company to Elad no later than March 20, 2012. In addition, all of the issued and outstanding stock options for common shares in the Company’s capital stock previously issued to the principals of Elad are to be exchanged into warrants on terms identical to the terms of the existing stock options (see note 7).

The $100,000 payment was made on March 20, 2012.

The Company recorded the reduction of the payable in the amount of $215,143 as recovery of research and development product development cost. This was measured as the difference between the amount payable to Elad and the settlement amount.

On September 19, 2012 the board of directors approved to cancel all the 905,000 options issued on January 4, 2012. These cancelled options will be exchanged into 905,000 warrants on terms identical to the terms of the existing stock options in the Company. This exchange is conditional and to be effective when the holder of the options agrees to the cancellation and exchange in the form acceptable to the Company

16

PART I

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND PLAN OF OPERATION

NINE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2012

The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of Security Devices International, Inc. (also referred to as "we", "us", "our", "SDI", or the "Company"), should be read in conjunction with the Company's financial statements (and related notes) as at November 30, 2011

The following discussion contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause SDI’s results to differ materially from expectations. When reviewing the Company's forward-looking statements, investors and others should carefully consider the foregoing factors and other uncertainties and potential events. These include risk relating to market fluctuations, performance, , strength of the North American and other world economies and foreign exchange fluctuations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof. Unless otherwise required by applicable securities laws, the Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update these forward-looking statements. The Company does have an ongoing obligation to disclose material information as it becomes available. The discussion also includes cautionary statements about these matters. You should read the cautionary statements made below as being applicable to all forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this document.

Nature of Business

Security Devices International, Inc (“SDI”) is a non-lethal defense technology company, specializing in the development of innovative next generation solutions for security situations that do not require the use of lethal force. SDI is currently in the market entry stage of deploying their non-lethal family of products. These products consist of; the Blunt Impact Projectile 40mm (BIP) family of products, and the Wireless Electric Projectile 40mm (WEP). The market sectors for these products include; the military, army, navy, air force, marines, peacekeeping, homeland security, and law enforcement professionals. The Company’s products were designed for a standard 40mm ammunition casing, for use with standard issue weapons such as riot guns and M203 grenade launchers.

The BIP is a direct impact non-lethal ammunition round. Developed to respond to the increasing demand for security solutions in circumstances that do not require lethal force to control. Patented technologies allow for operational effectiveness at distances of up to 262 feet (80m), while still enhancing target safety if engaged from close range.

The BIP operates with smokeless powder as a propellant, ensuring consistent velocity and accuracy at long distances. The head of the round has a collapsible nose that absorbs the kinetic energy upon impact. The Company holds a global patent for the collapsible nose.

Designed to supersede previous blunt impact solutions such as foam, baton, sponge rounds, and rubber bullets, the BIP’s technology enables the projectile to engage the target with higher kinetic energy while maintaining safety of the targeted subject.

The WEP is an electric ammunition round that was developed to answer the growing need for an effective, extended range incapacitation solution for situations that do not require the use of lethal force to control. Incorporating SDI’s patented and patent-pending technologies allows for this ammunition round to deliver operational success at distances up to feet 160 feet (50m). The WEP when deployed emits a Wireless Electro Neuro-Muscular Disruption Technology that incapacitates the targeted individual.

During and subsequent to the quarter, SDI passed two crucial third party assessments of their BIP munitions. The first being a human effects test by a third party, and the second was a DOT (Department of Transportation) testing procedure, also performed by a third party

The Company completed human effects testing on the BIP with a third party evaluator. The BIP passed the Critical Research & Training Less-Lethal’s (CRT) testing protocol. The stringent level of testing conducted by CRT Less Lethal Inc. of Seattle, Washington, consisted of ballistics accuracy and consistency, relative safety; wound profiling, and overall effectiveness.

Human volunteers were used during the test firing, revealing full effects to the lower body from the blunt trauma of the BIP. Extensive Wound Profiling from the tests were finalized in the third quarter of fiscal 2012 and presented along with a complete report to SDI from all of the testing performed by CRT.

17

CRT Less-Lethal Inc. was founded in 2003 to bridge the gap between law enforcement operators, administrators, medical personnel and scientists within the forensic community. The results combined with CRT’s extensive field experience are used for expert witness casework and creating less-lethal training programs for agencies around the globe.

The second, third party test was to confirm the safety of the BIP round during shipping. These tests provide that new explosives must be examined and assigned a recommended shipping description, classification, and compatibility group. Several tests including a drop test, heat test, and bonfire test were performed, and a US DOT report was generated giving SDI the go ahead to be able to ship rounds globally. A DOT number will be issued from the U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, using this report. SDI continues to test their new BIP Rounds including; a Powder Marking Round, a Liquid Marking Round, a Noxious Scented Round, an Oleoresin Capsicum (OC) – Pepper Spray Liquid Round, and a Practice Round.

The new product lines listed above are derivatives of the original BIP, which offer multiple purposes within each Round. Not only is pain compliance achieved but the temporary or semi-permanent marking ability of these Rounds allows for evidentiary-based occurrences. The OC Round offers a specially formulated liquid payload that acts as an irritant to the eyes and mouth, thus dispersing crowds in an effective manner. Through the use of these multi-purpose Rounds, the end-user has dramatically increased the psychological effect of making the target feel identifiable.

The Practice Round is used as a simulation Round for training purposes. This round was created to mimic the ballistics of the original BIP. This particular Round allows end-users to become certified at a lower cost than using the standard BIP Round. The cost of the Practice Round will be approximately one-third of the standard BIP. During the quarter, SDI was invited to and attended an Industry Day hosted by the Joint-Non-Lethal-Weapons-Directorate (JNLWD) of the US Department of Defense held at Marine Base Quantico, Virginia. The initiative was aimed at providing a better understanding of future research and technology development procurements. The JNLWD has made considerable efforts to bring together government and industry to discuss opportunities in U.S. DoD (Department of Defense) non-lethal weapons development.

The purpose of the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Program is to provide warfighters a family of non-lethal weapon systems with a range of capabilities across the full spectrum of threats and crises.

SDI intends to roll out its full line of Blunt Impact Projectiles (BIP) that are required by the Modern Warfighter and Law Enforcement personnel through its existing distribution channel (as announced January 10, 2012), as well as direct sales initiatives.

18

Going Concern

These unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which assumes that the Company will be able to meet its obligations and continue its operations for its next fiscal year. At August 31, 2012, the Company has no source of operating cash flows, has not achieved profitable operations, and has accumulated losses of $18,227,478 since inception and expects to incur further losses in the development of its business. These factors cast substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company has a need for additional working capital to launch its blunt impact and electric 40mm round products, meet its ongoing levels of corporate overhead, and discharge its liabilities as they come due.

In order to finance the continued development, the Company is working towards the raising of appropriate capital in the near future. In addition to raising funds in the prior years, the Company raised $160,000 through the issuance of 800,000 common shares during the year ended November 30, 2011.The Company further raised an additional $878,328 by issue of Convertible Debentures during the year ended November 30, 2011 and $910,000 during the nine month period ended August 31, 2012. In addition, the Company raised $400,000 by issuance of 1,033,333 common shares during the three month period ended August 31, 2012.

While the Company has been successful in securing financings in the past, there is no assurance that it will be able to do so in the future. These financial statements do not give effect to adjustments, if any, that would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

The Company has incurred a loss of $951,270 during the nine month period ended August 31, 2012, which includes $288,453 being stock based compensation expense relating to issue of options and warrants. At August 31, 2012, the Company had an accumulated deficit during the development stage of $18,227,478 which includes a non-cash stock based compensation expense of $5,844,859 for issue of options and warrants.

Significant Quarterly Information

The following represents selected information of the Company for the most recently completed financial quarter ended August 31, 2012

19

Results of Operations

SDI was incorporated on March 1, 2005 and for the period from inception to August 31, 2012 has not generated any revenue.

Financial highlights (unaudited) for the period ending August 31, 2012 with comparatives are as follows:

The Company’s selected information for the quarter ended August 31, 2012 (unaudited) and November 30, 2011(audited) are as follows:

Net loss for the three months ended August 31, 2012 was $350,630 ($0.01 per share) as compared to $205,180 ($0.01per share) for the three month period ended August 31, 2012. The major variance in net loss for the three months in 2012 as compared with 2011 is attributable to the following:

The major components of change relate to:

(i) Effective December 1, 2011, the Company executed an agreement with a Company in which the Chief Operating Officer has an interest in, for a period of ten months which expires September 30, 2012 for services rendered. The Company expensed $50,000 for the three month period ended August 31, 2012 and $27,000 for the three months ended August 31, 2011..

(ii) On August 9, 2012, the board of directors issued warrants to a Company owned and controlled by a director, to acquire a total of 400,000 common shares. These warrants were issued at an exercise price of $0.20 per share with an expiry term of four years. The Company expensed stock based compensation cost of $75,013.

(iii) The directors were compensated as per their consulting agreements with the Company. The Company expensed a total of $72,000 as Management fees for payment to its three directors and expensed a total of $1,800 as automobile allowance for the three months ended August 31, 2012. During the prior three month period ended August 31, 2011, the Company expensed a total of $18,000 as Management fee for payment to its two directors

20

Cash Flows

Net cash used in operations for the nine months ended August 31, 2012, was $881,786 as compared to $1,016,257 used for the nine months ended August 31, 2011. The major components of change relate to:

1) Items not affecting cash:

Stock based compensation of $288,453 in 2012, as compared to $Nil in 2011.

On January 4, 2012, the board of directors granted options to three directors to acquire a total of 775,000 common shares, one officer to acquire 20,000 common shares and two consultants to acquire a total of 110,000 common shares. The 905,000 options were issued at an exercise price of $0.13 per share and vest immediately with an expiry term of four years. The Company expensed stock based compensation expense for $113,292.

On January 4, 2012, the board of directors issued warrants to a Company in which the Chief Operating officer has an interest in, to acquire a total of 800,000 common shares. These warrants were issued at an exercise price of $0.13 per share with an expiry term of four years. The Company expensed stock based compensation cost of $100,148.

On August 9, 2012, the board of directors issued warrants to a Company owned and controlled by a director, to acquire a total of 400,000 common shares. These warrants were issued at an exercise price of $0.20 per share with an expiry term of four years. The Company expensed stock based compensation cost of $75,013.

Recovery of accounts payable for $(215,143) in 2012 as compared to $nil in 2012

On November 30, 2009, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with its former research and development services contractor Elad Engineering Ltd. (“Elad’) to settle their liability. On March 13, 2012, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with Elad to settle the accounts payable. Elad had previously performed services for the development of a less-than-lethal-electric-projectile and blunt impact projectile. At the date of the settlement agreement, the Company owed Elad $315,143.The Company and Elad agreed to irrevocably waive and release each other from any claim, demand or action in connection with services provided, upon payment of $100,000 by the Company to Elad no later than March 20, 2012. The $100,000 payment was made on March 20, 2012. The Company recorded the reduction of the payable in the amount of $215,143 as recovery of research and development product development cost. This was measured as the difference between the amount payable to Elad and the settlement amount.

2) Changes in non- cash balances relating to operations:

The Company’s prepaid expenses and other receivables decreased by $98,392 in 2012 as compared to increase of $60,346 in 2011.The primary reason for increase in prepaid expenses and other receivables for 2011 was an amount of $61,837 advanced to a supplier as a deposit for purchase of injection molds for their BIP40 ammunition rounds.

Net cash flow from investing activities was an outflow for $147,219 during the nine month period ended August 31, 2012 as compared to $ nil for the same period for prior year. The primary reason was the acquisition of moulds for $142,140 in 2012 as compared to $nil in 2011.

Net Cash flow from financing activities was an inflow of $1,310,000 for the nine month period ended August 31, 2012 as compared to an inflow for $838,328 for the nine month period ended August 31, 2011. The Company raised $910,000 by issue of convertible debentures and $400,000 by issuance of 1,033,333 common shares during the nine months period ended August 31, 2012. The Company raised $978,328 by issue of Convertible Debentures and $160,000 by issuance of 800,000 common shares during the nine months period ended August 31, 2011.

There was an overall increase in cash of $280,995 in 2012 as compared to a decrease of $177,929 during 2011.

21

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As at August 31, 2012, cash was $395,830, as compared to $114,835 at November 30, 2011. This increase is mainly attributable to the combination of factors mentioned above under heading “Cash Flows”.

At August 31, 2012, the Company had a working capital of $82,430. The major components are as follows; cash $395,830; prepaid expenses and other receivables $9,312; accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $176,212 and current portion of convertible debentures for $ 146,500.

At November 30, 2011, the Company had a working capital deficit of $ (471,538). The major components are as follows; cash $114,835; prepaid expenses and other receivables $107,704; deferred financing costs for $10,916; accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $568,995 and current portion of convertible debentures for $ 135,998.

The Company issued 1,333,333 shares of common stock to private investors at a price of $0.30 per share for a total consideration of $400,000. (Prior period-Issued 800,000 shares of common shares at a price of $0.20 per share for a total consideration of $160,000). The shares of common stock are restricted securities, as that term is defined in Rule 144 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company relied upon the exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with the sale of these securities.

The Company issued 1,484,169 common shares for conversion of convertible debentures having face value of $411,828 (Convertible debenture 2) and accrued interest of $33,423. The total debt for $445,251 was converted into 1,484,169 common shares at $0.30 per share.

The Company raised $910,000 by issue of Convertible Debentures during the nine month period ended August 31, 2012 ($878,328 during nine months ended August 31, 2011).

The change in the working capital at August 31, 2012 as compared to November 30, 2011 is a direct result of operations and other factors as mentioned above.

During the period from inception (March 1, 2005) through August 31, 2012, SDI’s operations used $11,473,156 in cash. During this period SDI purchased $205,992 of equipment and raised $12,074,978 from financing activities.

SDI anticipates that its capital requirements for the next twelve-month period ending August 31, 2013 will be:

There are no assurances that the Company can continue to raise equity financing to fund its operations. SDI does not have any commitments or arrangements from any persons to provide SDI with any additional capital it may need. Without additional capital SDI will not be able to fund its anticipated capital requirements outlined above.

On March 13, 2012, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with Elad Engineering Ltd. (“Elad”). Elad has performed over the past several years, research and development services for the Company in the less–than-lethal ammunitions sector, for the development of a less-than-lethal-electric-projectile and later on, a blunt impact projectile (“Prior Services”). The Company had debt owing to Elad in excess of $300,000 for past services as of the date of the definitive agreement.

22

Both parties agreed to irrevocably waive and release the other from any claim, demand or action in connection with its engagement with the other party for Prior Services subject to payment of $100,000 by the Company to Elad no later than March 20, 2012, and the balance owing by the Company to Elad to be forgiven and waived by Elad. The company completed the final payment of $100,000 by the due date, and negotiated and extinguished its debt payable. In addition, the Company has executed as part of this agreement with Elad, a full waiver and release, which includes confidentiality and non-compete clauses for the Company’s products.

In addition, all of the issued and outstanding stock options for common shares in the Company’s capital stock previously issued to Elad, Ilan Shalev and Haim Danon (being principals of Elad) were converted into warrants on terms identical to the terms of the existing stock options in the Company. The Company may retain future services of Elad for ongoing maintenance of existing projects created through Prior Services, to be discussed under separate letter form to the agreement.

Off-balance sheet arrangements

The Company has no significant off-balance sheet arrangements at this time.

Transactions with related parties

The directors were compensated as per their consulting agreements with the Company. The Company expensed a total of $198,000 as Management fees for payment to its three directors and expensed a total of $4,800 as automobile allowance.

On January 4, 2012, the board of directors granted options to three directors to acquire a total of 775,000 common shares and one officer to acquire 20,000 common shares. All these 795,000 options were issued at an exercise price of $0.13 per share and vest immediately with an expiry term of four years. The Company expensed stock based compensation cost of $99,522 for these options.

On January 4, 2012, the board of directors issued warrants to a Company in which the Chief Operating officer has an interest in, to acquire a total of 800,000 common shares. These warrants were issued at an exercise price of $0.13 per share with an expiry term of four years. The Company expensed stock based compensation cost of $100,148.

On August 9, 2012, the board of directors issued warrants to a Company owned and controlled by a director, to acquire a total of 400,000 common shares. These warrants were issued at an exercise price of $0.20 per share with an expiry term of four years. The Company expensed stock based compensation cost of $75,013.

The Company expensed $18,050 for services provided by the CFO of the Company and $151,600 for services provided by a Company in which the Chief Operating Officer has an interest.

23

Commitments

a) Consulting agreements:

The directors of the Company executed consulting agreement with the Company on the following terms: Agreement with a director to pay compensation for $5,000 per month. The agreement expired August 30, 2012 Agreement with a director to pay compensation for $7,000 per month. The agreement expires December 31, 2012.

Agreement with the Chief Executive Officer to pay compensation for $12,000 per month plus a car allowance for $600 per month. The agreement expires December 31, 2016. The monthly remuneration will increase with accomplishment of milestones.

Effective December 1, 2011, SDI executed an agreement with a Company in which the Chief Operating Officer has an interest in, for a period of ten months which expires September 30, 2012 for services rendered. The total consulting fees are estimated at $200,000 for the ten month period. The Company has expensed $151,600 for the nine month period ended August 31, 2012. The Company may also accept common shares at $0.25 per common share in lieu of cash. As of August 31, 2012, the Company has not exercised its right to accept this compensation in shares.

b) The Company has commitments for leasing office premises in Oakville, Ontario, Canada to September 30, 2012 at a monthly rent (excluding proportionate realty and maintenance costs and taxes) of Canadian $2,500 per month.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s revenue recognition policies are expected to follow common practice in the manufacturing industry. The Company will record revenue when it is realized, or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue to be realized, or realizable and earned, when the following revenue recognition requirements will be met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; the products or services have been accepted by the customer via delivery or installation acceptance; the sales price is fixed or determinable; and collectability is probable. For product sales, the Company determines that the earnings process is complete when title, risk of loss and the right to use equipment has transferred to the customer.

Outstanding share data

As of September 10, 2012, the Company had 29,645,552 issued and outstanding shares of common stock

24

Risk Factors

General Venture Company Risks

The Common Shares of SDI must be considered highly speculative due to the nature of the Company’s business, its current financial position and ongoing requirements for capital. An investment in the Common Stock of SDI should only be considered by those persons who can afford a total loss of investment, and is not suited to those investors who may need to dispose of their investment in a timely fashion. Investors should consult with their own professional advisors to assess the legal, financial and other aspects of an investment in Common Stock of SDI.

Uncertainty of Revenue Growth

There can be no assurance that the Company can generate substantial revenue growth, or that any revenue growth that is achieved can be sustained. Revenue growth that the Company may achieve may not be indicative of future operating results. In addition, the Company may increase further its operating expenses in order to fund higher levels of research and development, increase its sales and marketing efforts and increase its administrative resources in anticipation of future growth. To the extent that increases in such expenses precede or are not subsequently followed by increased revenues, the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition will be materially adversely affected.

Dependence on Management and Key Personnel

The Company is dependent on certain members of its management and its consultants. The loss of the services of one or more of them could adversely affect the Company. The Company’s ability to maintain its competitive position is dependent upon its ability to attract and retain highly qualified managerial, specialized technical, manufacturing, sales and marketing personnel. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue to recruit and retain such personnel. The inability of the Company to recruit and retain such personnel would adversely affect the Company’s operations and product development.

Dependence on Key Suppliers

The Company may be able to purchase certain key components of its products from a limited number of suppliers. Failure of a supplier to provide sufficient quantities on favourable terms or on a timely basis could result in possible lost sales.

Product Liability

The Company may be subject to proceedings or claims that may arise in the ordinary conduct of the business, which could include product and service warranty claims, which could be substantial. If its products fail to perform as warranted and it fails to quickly resolve product quality or performance issues in a timely manner, sales may be lost and it may be forced to pay damages. Any failure to meet customer requirements could materially affect its business, results of operations and financial condition. The occurrence of product defects and the inability to correct errors could result in the delay or loss of market acceptance of its products, material warranty expense, diversion of technological and other resources from its product development efforts, and the loss of credibility with customers, manufacturer’s representatives, distributors, value added resellers, systems integrators, original equipment manufacturers and end-users, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial conditions.

The Company currently has general liability insurance which includes product liability coverage. There is no assurance this insurance policy will cover all potential claims which may have a material adverse effect on the business or financial condition of the Company. A product recall could have a material adverse effect on the business or financial condition of the Company.

Strategic Alliances

The Company relies upon, and expects to rely upon, strategic alliances with original equipment manufacturers for the manufacturing and distribution of its products. There can be no assurance that such strategic alliances can be achieved or will achieve their goals.

25

Limited Marketing and Distribution Capabilities

The Company does not have adequate marketing or distribution capabilities. In order to commercialize its technology, the Company must either acquire or develop an internal marketing and sales force with technical expertise and with supporting distribution capabilities or arrange for third parties to perform these services. In order to market any of its technology, the Company must either acquire or develop a sales and distribution infrastructure. The acquisition or development of a sales and distribution infrastructure would require substantial resources, which may divert the attention of its Management and key personnel, and defer its product development and deployment efforts. To the extent that the Company enters into marketing and sales arrangements with other companies, its revenues will depend on the efforts of others. These efforts may not be successful. If the Company fails to develop substantial sales, marketing and distribution channels, or to enter into arrangements with third parties for those purposes, it will experience delays in product sales and incur increased costs.

Rapid Technological Development

The markets for the Company’s products and services are characterized by rapidly changing technology and evolving industry standards, which could result in product obsolescence or short product life cycles. Accordingly, the Company’s success is dependent upon its ability to anticipate technological changes in the industries it serves and to successfully identify, obtain, develop and market new products that satisfy evolving industry requirements.

There can be no assurance that the Company will successfully develop new products or enhance and improve its existing products or that any new products and enhanced and improved existing products will achieve market acceptance. Further, there can be no assurance that competitors will not market products that have perceived advantages over the Company’s products or which render the products currently sold by the Company obsolete or less marketable.

The Company must commit significant resources to developing new products before knowing whether its investments will result in products the market will accept. To remain competitive, the Company may be required to invest significantly greater resources then currently anticipated in research and development and product enhancement efforts, and result in increased operating expenses.

Competition

The Company’s industry is highly competitive and composed of many domestic and foreign companies. The Company has experienced and expects to continue to experience, substantial competition from numerous competitors whom it expects to continue to improve their products and technologies. Competitors may announce and introduce new products, services or enhancements that better meet the needs of end-users or changing industry standards, or achieve greater market acceptance due to pricing, sales channels or other factors. Competitors may be able to respond more quickly than the Company to changes in end-user requirements and devote greater resources to the enhancement, promotion and sale of their products.

Regulation

The Company is subject to numerous federal, provincial, state and local environmental, health and safety legislation and measures relating to the manufacture of ammunition. There can be no assurance that the Company will not experience difficulties with its efforts to comply with applicable regulations as they change in the future or that its continued compliance efforts (or failure to comply with applicable requirements) will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, business, prospects and financial condition. The Company’s continued compliance with present and changing future laws could restrict the Company’s ability to modify or expand its facilities or continue production and could require the Company to acquire costly equipment or to incur other significant expense.

26

Intellectual Property

The Company’s ability to compete effectively will depend, in part, on its ability to maintain the proprietary nature of its technology and manufacturing processes. Although the Company considers certain of its product designs as well as manufacturing processes involving certain of its products to be proprietary, patents or copyrights do not protect all design and manufacturing processes. The Company has adopted procedures to protect its intellectual property and maintain secrecy of its confidential business information and trade secrets. However, there can be no assurance that such procedures will afford complete protection of such intellectual property, confidential business information and trade secrets. There can be no assurance that the Company’s competitors will not independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to the Company’s technology.

To protect the Company’s intellectual property, it may become involved in litigation, which could result in substantial expenses, divert the attention of its management, cause significant delays and materially disrupt the conduct of its business.

Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights

While the Company believes that its products and other intellectual property do not infringe upon the proprietary rights of third parties, its commercial success depends, in part, upon the Company not infringing intellectual property rights of others. A number of the Company’s competitors and other third parties have been issued or may have filed patent applications or may obtain additional patents and proprietary rights for technologies similar to those utilized by the Company. Some of these patents may grant very broad protection to the owners of the patents. The Company has not undertaken a review to determine whether any existing third party patents or the issuance of any third party patents would require the Company to alter its technology, obtain licenses or cease certain activities. The Company may become subject to claims by third parties that its technology infringes their intellectual property

rights due to the growth of products in its target markets, the overlap in functionality of those products and the prevalence of products. The Company may become subject to these claims either directly or through indemnities against these claims that it provides to end-users, manufacturer’s representatives, distributors, value added resellers, system integrators and original equipment manufacturers.

Litigation may be necessary to determine the scope, enforceability and validity of third party proprietary rights or to establish the Company’s proprietary rights. Some of its competitors have, or are affiliated with companies having, substantially greater resources than the Company and these competitors may be able to sustain the costs of complex intellectual property litigation to a greater degree and for a longer period of time than the Company. Regardless of their merit, any such claims could be time consuming to evaluate and defend, result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays or stoppages, divert management’s attention and focus away from the business, subject the Company to significant liabilities and equitable remedies, including injunctions, require the Company to enter into costly royalty or licensing agreements and require the Company to modify or stop using infringing technology.

The Company may be prohibited from developing or commercializing certain technologies and products unless it obtains a license from a third party. There can be no assurance that it will be able to obtain any such license on commercially favourable terms or at all. If it does not obtain such a license, it could be required to cease the sale of certain of its products.

Uncertainty of Additional Capital

The Company anticipates expending substantial funds to carry out the development, introduction and manufacture of additional products. The Company will require additional funds for these purposes through one or more public or private equity financings, by taking on debt financing, or from other sources. No assurance can be given that such additional funds will be available on acceptable terms or at all. If such funds are unavailable or are only available at a prohibitive cost, the Company may have to significantly curtail its product development program or seek funds through financing alternatives that may require the Company to sell its rights to certain products or certain marketing territories. Any additional equity financing may result in dilution to existing shareholders.

Currency Fluctuations

Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the United States dollar and the Canadian dollar may have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations. To date, the Company has not engaged in exchange rate-hedging activities. To the extent that the Company may seek to implement hedging techniques in the future with respect to its foreign currency transactions, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in such hedging activities.

27

Stress in the global financial system may adversely affect the Company’s finances and operations in ways that may be hard to predict or to defend against

Recent events have demonstrated that businesses and industries throughout the world are very tightly connected to each other. Thus, events seemingly unrelated to the Company, or to its industry, may adversely affect its finances or operations in ways that are hard to predict or defend against. For example, credit contraction in financial markets may hurt the Company’s ability to access credit when it is needed or rapid changes in foreign exchange rates may adversely affect financial results. Finally, a reduction in credit, combined with reduced economic activity, may adversely affect businesses and industries that collectively constitute a significant portion of the Company’s customer base. As a result, these customers may need to reduce their purchases of the Company’s products, or there may be greater difficulty in receiving payment for the products that these customers purchase from the Company. Any of these events, or any other events caused by turmoil in world financial markets, may have a material adverse effect on the business, operating results, and financial condition.

Insurance and Uninsured Risks

The Company’s business is subject to a number of risks and hazards including industrial accidents, labour disputes, changes in the regulatory environment. Such occurrences could result in damage to equipment, personal injury or death, monetary losses and possible legal liability. Although the Company maintains liability insurance in amounts which it considers adequate, the nature of these risks is such that liabilities might exceed policy limits, the liabilities and hazards might not be insurable, or the Company may elect not to insure against such liabilities due to high premium costs or other reasons, in which event the Company could incur significant costs that could have a materially adverse effect upon its financial position.

Dividend Policy

The Company has not paid dividends in the past and has no plans to pay dividends for the foreseeable future. The future dividend policy of the Company will be determined by its directors.

28

Lack of Active Market

There can be no assurance that an active market for the Common Shares of the Company will continue and any increased demand to buy or sell the Common Shares of the Company can create volatility in price and volume.

Trading on OTC Bulletin Board

The Company’s common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board service of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Trading in stock quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board is often thin and characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices, due to many factors that may have little to do with its operations or business prospects. This volatility could depress the market price of the Company’s common stock for reasons unrelated to operating performance. Moreover, the OTC Bulletin Board is not a stock exchange, and trading of securities on the OTC Bulletin Board is often more sporadic than the trading of securities listed on a quotation system like the Nasdaq or the TSX-Venture Exchange. Accordingly, shareholders may have difficulty reselling any of the shares.

Penny Stock Regulations

The Company’s stock is a penny stock. The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which generally defines “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. The securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broken-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”. The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade the securities.

FINRA Regulations

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, FINRA (the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, a broker-dealer must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers purchase the Company’s common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell the stock and have an adverse effect on the Company’s market share.

Market Price of Common Shares

There can be no assurance that an active market for the Common Shares will be sustained. Securities of small and mid cap companies have experienced substantial volatility in the past, often based on factors unrelated to the financial performance or prospects of the companies involved. These factors include global economic developments and market perceptions of the attractiveness of certain industries. The price per Common Share is also likely to be affected by change in the Company’s financial condition or results of operations as reflected in its quarterly filings. Other factors unrelated to the performance of the Company that may have an effect on the price of Common Shares include the following: the extent of analytical coverage available to subscribers concerning the business of the Company may be limited if investment banks with research capabilities do not follow the Company’s securities; lessening in trading volume and general market interest in the Company’s securities may affect a subscriber’s ability to trade significant numbers of Common Shares, the size of the Company’s public float may limit the ability of some institutions to invest in the Company’s securities; a substantial decline in the price of the Common Shares that persists for a significant period of time could cause the Company’s securities to be delisted from the exchange, further reducing market liquidity. If an active market for the Common Shares does not continue, the liquidity of a subscriber’s investment may be limited and the price of the Common Shares may decline. If such a market does not develop, subscribers may lose their entire investment in the Common Shares.

29

Dilution

The Company is authorized to issue up to 50,000,000 shares. The board of directors of the Company have the authority to cause an issuance of additional shares, and to determine the rights, preferences and privileges of such shares, without consent of any of the shareholders. Consequently, the shareholders may experience more dilution in their ownership of the Company in the future.

As a result of any of these factors, the market price of the Common Shares at any given point in time may not accurately reflect the long term value of the Company. Securities class-action litigation often has been brought against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. The Company may in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and damages and divert management’s attention and resources.

Legal proceedings

There are no legal proceedings involving the Company or its assets which management of the Company believes to be material to the Company, nor are any such proceedings known by the Company to be contemplated.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

(a) SDI maintains a system of controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“1934 Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by SDI in the reports that it files or submits under the 1934 Act, is accumulated and communicated to SDI’s management, including its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of August 31, 2012, SDI’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of SDI’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, SDI’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that SDI’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls. There were no changes in SDI’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended August 31, 2012 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.

30

PART II

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During the quarter ended August 31, 2012, the Company issued 1,484,169 common shares for conversion of convertible debentures having face value of $411,828 and accrued interest of $33,423. The total debt for $445,251 was converted into 1,484,169 common shares at $0.30 per share. SDI relied upon the exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with these securities.

In August 2012 the Company sold, in a private offering, 1,333,333 shares of its common stock at a price of $0.30 per share. SDI relied upon the exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with the sale of these securities. The investors that acquired the shares were sophisticated and wer provided with full information regarding the Company. There was no general solicitation in connection with the offer or sale of the securities. The investors that acquired these securities acquired them for their own accounts. The certificate representing these securities bears a restricted legend providing that they cannot be sold except pursuant to an effective registration statement or an exemption from registration. No commission or other form of remuneration was given to any person in connection with the sale of these securities.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibits

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Date: October 3, 2012

By: /s/ Gregory Sullivan
-----------------------------------
Gregory Sullivan, President
and Principal Executive
Officer

Date: October 3, 2012

By: /s/ Rakesh Malhotra
-----------------------------------
Rakesh Malhotra, Principal
Financial and Accounting
Officer

31