Security Devices International Inc.: Form 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

25 Sawyer Passway, Fitchburg
Massachusetts, 01420
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

N/A
Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [ ] No [X]

As of June 30, 2016, the Company had 54,615,642 issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets
As at May 31, 2016 and November 30, 2015
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)

Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive loss
For the Six months and Three Months Ended May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Six Months Ended May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Interim Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency)
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

						Accumulated
	Number of	Common	Additional			Other
	Common	Shares	Paid-in			Comprehensive
	Shares	amount	Capital	Deficiency		loss		Total
	$	$	$	$		$		$

Balance as of November 30, 2014	46,899,285	46,899	24,024,631	(24,042,769	)	(31,706	)	(2,945	)
Issue of common shares	7,575,757	7,576	2,492,424					2,500,000
Exercise of options	35,000	35	6,960					6,995
Exercise of warrants	105,600	106	16,669					16,775
Stock based compensation for issue of options			422,459					422,459
Stock based compensation for modification of warrants			216,684					216,684
Net loss for the year				(2,550,438	)			(2,550,438	)
Foreign currency translation						(15,033	)	(15,033	)
Balance as of November 30, 2015	54,615,642	54,616	27,179,827	(26,593,207	)	(46,739	)	594,497
Net loss for the period				(852,026	)			(852,026	)
Foreign currency translation						(7,830	)	(7,830	)
Balance as of May 31, 2016	54,615,642	54,616	27,179,827	(27,445,233	)	(54,569	)	(265,359	)

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
May 31, 2016
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP); however, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods.

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto together with management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations contained in Security Devices International Inc.’s (“SDI” or the “Company”) annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2015. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary to fairly state the financial position of the Company at May 31, 2016 and November 30, 2015, the results of its operations for the six and three-month periods ended May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015, and its cash flows for the six-month periods ended May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015. In addition, some of the Company’s statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q may be considered forward-looking and involve risks and uncertainties that could significantly impact expected results. The results of operations for the six-month period ended May 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year.

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware on March 1, 2005. On February 3, 2014 the Company incorporated a wholly owned subsidiary in Canada “Security Devices International Canada Corp”. The interim unaudited consolidated financial statements for the period ended May 31, 2015 include the accounts of Security Devices International, Inc. (the “Company” or “SDI”), and its subsidiaries Security Devices International Canada Corp. and SDI-Sage Acquisition Inc. All material inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

The Company is a less-lethal defense technology company, specializing in the innovative next generation solutions for security situations that do not require the use of lethal force. SDI has implemented manufacturing partnerships to assist in the deployment of their patented and patent pending family of products. These products consist of the current manufacture of Blunt Impact Projectile 40mm (BIP) line of products, and the future Wireless Electric Projectile 40mm (WEP).

These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which assumes that the Company will be able to meet its obligations and continue its operations for its next fiscal year.

The Company has not earned adequate revenue and has used cash in its operations. Therefore, the Company will need additional financing to continue its operations if it is unable to generate substantial revenue growth.

The Company has incurred a cumulative loss of $27,445,233 from inception to May 31, 2016. The Company has funded operations through the issuance of capital stock and convertible debentures. The Company has started to generate revenue from operations. However, it still expects to incur significant expenses before becoming profitable. The Company’s future success is dependent upon its ability to raise sufficient capital or generate adequate revenue, to cover its ongoing operating expenses, and also to continue to develop and be able to profitably market its products. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
May 31, 2016
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

In addition to raising funds in the prior years, the Company raised $878,328 by issue of Convertible Debentures during the year ended November 30, 2011 and $910,000 during the year ended November 30, 2012. In addition, the Company raised $649,750 by issuance of 2,165,834 common shares during the year ended November 30, 2012. On August 15, 2013, the Company filed an amended and restated final prospectus (the “Prospectus”) in Canada, in the provinces of Alberta, British Columbia and Ontario for listing its shares in these provinces in Canada. On August 27, 2013 the Company completed an initial public offering to raise gross proceeds of CAD $3,993,980 (US $3,794,280) through the issuance of 9,984,950 Common Shares at a price of CAD $0.40 (US $0.38) per Common Share (the “Issue Price”). During the year ended November 30, 2014, the Company issued $1,398,592 (CAD $1,549,000) face value 12% convertible debentures with a term to August 6, 2017 (the “Maturity Date”) and raised net $1,241,299. In 2015, the Company raised $2,500,000 through the issuance of 7,575,757 common shares and also issued 105,600 common shares on exercise of warrants for $16,775 and 35,000 common shares on exercise of options for $6,995. The Company’s common shares commenced trading on the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSX”) under the symbol “SDZ”.

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
May 31, 2016
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided commencing in the month following acquisition using the following annual rate and method:

*On March 20, 2013 the Company filed with the Secretary of the State of Delaware a certificate of amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Company’s certificate of incorporation. The Amendment increased the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001, from 50,000,000 to 100,000,000 common shares.

The Company’s Articles of Incorporation authorize its Board of Directors to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The provisions in the Articles of Incorporation relating to the preferred stock allow the directors to issue preferred stock with multiple votes per share and dividend rights, which would have priority over any dividends paid with respect to the holders of SDI’s common stock.

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
May 31, 2016
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

On June 3, 2015, the Company received $16,775 and $6,995 for the exercise of 105,600 warrants and 35,000 options respectively.

On June 19, 2015, the Company issued 7,575,757 common stock at price of $0.33 (CAD $0.40) per share on a non-brokered private placement basis and raised $2,500,000. There were no broker commissions or fees associated with this subscription. The closing of the private placement was approved by the TSX-Venture Exchange, as required under stock exchange rules.

The Company did not issue any shares during the six- month period ended May 31, 2016.

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
May 31, 2016
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

Effective May 31, 2013, the Company adopted an incentive stock option plan (the “2013 Plan”), which replaces the stock option and stock bonus plans that were in place prior to adoption of the 2013 Plan. All outstanding options to purchase Common Shares granted by the Company under the prior plans are now governed by the 2013 Plan and the prior plans (an Incentive Stock Option Plan, a Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, and a Stock Bonus Plan) have been terminated.

The purpose of this Plan is to authorize the grant to Eligible Persons of the Company of Options to purchase Shares and thus benefit the Company by enabling it to attract, retain and motivate Eligible Persons by providing them with the opportunity, through Options, to acquire an increased proprietary interest in the Company.

The maximum number of Shares which may be reserved for issuance to any one Consultant under the Plan, any other employer stock options plans or options for services, within any 12-month period, shall be 2% of the Shares issued and outstanding at the time of the grant (on a non-diluted basis).

The maximum number of Shares which may be reserved for issuance to Investor Relations Optionees under the Plan, any other employer stock options plans or options for services, within any 12-month period shall be 2% of the Shares issued and outstanding at the time of the grant (on a non-diluted basis).

The maximum number of Shares which may be reserved for issuance to insiders of the Company in any 12-month period shall be 10% of the Shares issued and outstanding at the start of such 12-month period (on a non-diluted basis).

The purchase price (the “Price”) for the Shares under each Option shall be determined by the Board of Directors or Committee, as applicable, on the basis of the market price, where “market price” shall mean the prior trading day closing price of the Shares on any stock exchange on which the Shares are listed or last trading price on the prior trading day on any dealing network where the Shares trade, and where there is no such closing price or trade on the prior trading day, “market price” shall mean the average of the daily high and low board lot trading prices of the Shares on any stock exchange on which the Shares are listed or dealing network on which the Shares trade for the five (5) immediately preceding trading days. In the event the Shares are listed on the TSXV, the price may be the market price less any discounts from the market price allowed by the TSXV, subject to a minimum price of CDN$0.10.

On September 24, 2015, the board of directors extended the expiry dates of 572,000 warrants issued in 2010 to directors and officers at exercise price of $0.20, from original expiry date of September 30, 2015 to September 23, 2019. In addition, on same date, the board of directors extended the expiry dates of 1,470,000 warrants issued to directors and officers and 35,000 to a consultant, all issued in 2012 at exercise price of $0.13, from original expiry date of January 4, 2016 to September 23, 2019. The change in the terms of the warrants was determined to be a modification and not a cancellation and issuance of a new warrant. As a result of these modifications, the fair value of 2,077,000 warrants increased by $216,684. Fair value of warrants was calculated using the Black Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

On October 20, 2015, the board of directors granted 1,350,000 options to directors and officers and 325,000 options to consultants to acquire a total of 1,675,000 common shares. These options were issued at an exercise price of $0.29 (CAD $0.38) per share and vest immediately with an expiry term of five years. The fair value of each option used for the purpose of estimating the stock compensation is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

As of November 30, 2015 there was $Nil of unrecognized expense related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements granted.

The Company did not issue any options during the six- month period ended May 31, 2016.

As of May 31, 2016 there was $Nil of unrecognized expense related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements granted.

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
May 31, 2016
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

The following transactions are in the normal course of operations and are measured at the exchange amount, which is the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.

The directors were compensated as per their consulting agreements with the Company. The Company expensed a total of $106,600 as management fees to two of its directors, in their role as officers in accordance with their consulting contracts and expensed a total of $2,680 as automobile allowance. In addition, the Company expensed $42,200 as a consulting fee to an independent director for services provided.

The Company expensed $12,400 for services provided by the CFO of the Company and $107,200 for services provided by a Corporation in which the Chief Operating Officer has an ownership interest, in accordance with the consulting contract.

The Company reimbursed $17,190 to directors and officers for travel and entertainment expenses incurred for the Company.

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
May 31, 2016
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

The directors were compensated as per their consulting agreements with the Company. The Company expensed a total of $104,700 as management fees to these two directors, in their role as officers in accordance with their consulting contracts and expensed a total of $3,000 as automobile allowance.

The Company expensed $11,000 for services provided by the CFO of the Company and $110,130 for services provided by a Corporation in which the Chief Operating Officer has an ownership interest, in accordance with the consulting contract.

The Company reimbursed $46,100 to directors and officers for travel and entertainment expenses incurred for the Company.

The non-independent directors of the Company executed consulting agreements with the company on the following terms:

Effective January 1, 2015, SDI executed a two- year agreement with a private company in which a director, Allen Ezer, has an ownership interest. The agreement is for a period of two years ending December 31, 2016 at a monthly fee of $6,694 (CAD $8,925) with a 5% increase effective January 1, 2016. Either party may terminate the consulting agreement by giving 90 days’ written notice. In the event of termination without cause due to change in control brought out by sale, lease, merger or transfer, the Company is obligated to pay 12 months’ fees at current rate at time of change in control. Effective February 1, 2015, the Company and director agreed to reduce the monthly fees by 10% to $6,024 (CAD $8,032). This reduction continued until the completion of the next round of financing, which was completed in May 2015.

Effective January 1, 2012, SDI executed an agreement with the Chief Executive Officer Greg Sullivan to pay compensation of $9,000 (CAD$12,000) per month, with an annual 5% increase and a car allowance of $450 (CAD$600) per month. The agreement expires on December 31, 2016. In the event of termination without cause, the Company is obligated to pay two times the then annual compensation and by continuing the then benefits coverage for a period of 2 years. The annual remuneration will increase with accomplishment of milestones. The agreement may be terminated with mutual consent or by the Chief Executive Officer giving three weeks’ notice. Effective February 1, 2015, the Company and director agreed to reduce the monthly remuneration by 10% to $9,377 (CAD $12,502). This reduction continued until the completion of the next round of financing, which was completed in May 2015. Subsequent to the quarter, on June 20, 2016, the Company announced that Greg Sullivan will be resigning as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer effective July 15, 2016. (See subsequent events note 12).

Effective October 1, 2014, SDI executed a renewal agreement with a private company in which the Chief Operating Officer Dean Thrasher has an ownership interest in, for a period which expires on December 31, 2017 for services rendered. The total consulting fees are estimated at $648,000 (CAD$864,000) for the three-year period. In the event of termination without cause due to change in control brought out by sale, lease, merger or transfer, the Company is obligated to pay 18 months’ fees at current rate at time of change in control. SDI paid cash and expensed $ 221,217 (CAD $230,892) during the year ended November 30, 2015. The company may also accept common shares in lieu of cash. As of May 31, 2016, the company has not exercised its right to accept this compensation in shares. Effective February 1, 2015, the Company and director agreed to reduce the monthly remuneration by 10% to $162,000 (CAD $21,600). This reduction continued until the completion of the next round of financing, which was completed in May 2015.

Effective November 1, 2013, SDI executed an agreement with a non-related consultant to pay compensation of $3,750 (CAD $5,000) per month. The consultant has agreed to provide corporate market advisory services. The agreement is for a period of a minimum of three months and will continue unless otherwise terminated by either party by giving 30 days’ written notice.

Effective May 1, 2015, SDI executed an agreement with another non-related consultant to pay compensation of $3,750 (CAD $5,000) per month. The consultant is to assist with sales initiatives, demos and participate in trade shows. The agreement unless renewed by mutual consent expires December 31, 2015. The consultant is also entitled to a 5% cash commission for all completed direct sales to end users and a 2% cash commission for all completed indirect sales. In addition, as a sales incentive, the company may grant stock options at market prices, being 25,000 stock options for every 5,000 rounds sold, to a maximum of 200,000 options. Either party may terminate the consulting agreement by giving 60 days’ written notice.

Effective April 2014, SDI executed an agreement with a non-related consultant to set up its social media sites and optimization of search engines for the Company, at a start- up fee for $2,250 (CAD$3,000) (Phase 1) and payment of $2,250 (CAD$3,000) per month and issued 150,000 stock options at $0.32 (CAD$0.38) when Phase 2 of the project was implemented.

Effective August 2014, SDI executed an agreement with a non-related consultant to pay compensation of $5,500 per month for the first 5 months and $5,000 from sixth month to end of the term. The consultant is to assist with sales initiatives, demos and participate in trade shows. The agreement unless renewed by mutual consent expires December 31, 2015. On renewal, there will an annual increase of 4.5% effective January 1, 2016. The consultant is also entitled to a 5% cash commission for all completed direct sales to end users and a 2% cash commission for all completed indirect sales. The Company granted 50,000 stock options to the consultant on July 25, 2014 and has agreed to grant 25,000 stock options for every 5,000 rounds sold domestically to a maximum of an additional 150,000 options. Either party may terminate the consulting agreement by giving 30 days’ written notice.

Effective May 1, 2016, the Company executed a one-year consulting agreement with a consultant who will assist the Company with sales & marketing, expansion of the Company’s product range, review of operations, implementation of cost control measures, development of strategic alliances and financial oversight. For the consultant services and subject to TSX Venture Exchange Inc. (the “Stock Exchange”) approval, the consultant will be paid cash for $50,000 and issued a value of $200,000 in Company’s stock in four quarterly installments over the 12-month period ending May 15, 2017. The first quarterly installment is due August 15, 2016. The stock will be priced at the volume weighted average trading price per common share over the 20- day period preceding the due date.

b) The Company has commitments for leasing office premises in Oakville, Ontario, Canada to April 30, 2018 at a monthly rent of $4,800 (CAD $6,399).

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
May 31, 2016
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

The Company entered into a Development, Supply and Manufacturing Agreement with the BIP Manufacturer on July 25, 2012. This Agreement provides the Company to order and purchase only from the BIP Manufacturer certain 40MM assemblies and components for use by the Company to produce less-lethal and training projectiles as described in the Agreement. The Agreement is for a term of five years with an automatic extension for an additional year if neither party has given written notice of termination prior to the end of the five-year period.

The Company and a division of Abrams Airborne Manufacturing Inc. (AAMI), namely Milkor USA (MUSA), agreed to partner for a joint cross-selling / marketing initiative. This arrangement allows both companies to leverage existing and future sales channels by offering a comprehensive, full-package of Milkor USA’s 40mm Multi-Shot Grenade Launchers in conjunction with SDI’s 40mm Less-Lethal ammunition product-line to end-users globally.

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
May 31, 2016
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

On August 6, 2014, the Company issued $1,398,592 (CAD $1,549,000) face value 12% convertible debentures with a term to August 6, 2017 (the “Maturity Date”). At any time while the debentures are outstanding, the holder has the option to convert the outstanding principal of the debentures into common shares of the Company at a fixed conversion price of CAD $0.50 per share. At any time after February 6, 2015, the Company has the right to force the conversion of the debentures into common shares at a price of at least CAD$0.65 per common share for a period of at least 20 consecutive trading days. If the common shares do not trade on any trading day and the bid price of the common Shares is CAD $0.65 or greater, the common shares shall be deemed to have traded at a price of at least CAD $0.65 on that trading day. Additionally, the Company has the right to redeem the debentures, in whole or in part, (a) during the 12 months ending August 6, 2015, at a premium of 15% to the principal amount being redeemed plus any accrued interest, (b) during the 12 months ending August 6, 2016, at a premium of 5% to the principal amount being redeemed plus any accrued interest, (c) during the 12 months ending August 6, 2017, at a premium of 2% to the principal amount being redeemed plus any accrued interest. In connection with the financing, the Company issued warrants to placement agents to purchase 151,900 shares of common stock at an exercise price of CAD $0.50 per share. Additionally, the Company incurred $157,293 (CAD $174,209) in financing fees.

The Company has evaluated the terms and conditions of the convertible debentures and placement agent warrants under the guidance of ASC 815. The conversion feature met the definition of conventional convertible for purposes of applying the conventional convertible exemption. The definition of conventional contemplates a fixed number of shares issuable under the arrangement. The instrument was convertible into a fixed number of shares and there were no down round anti-dilution protection features contained in the contracts. The Company was required to consider whether the hybrid contract embodied a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”). The debentures did not result in a BCF because the conversion price was not in the money on the inception date. There were no terms or features contained in the warrant agreement that would preclude the warrants from achieving equity classification.

The following table reflects the allocation of the purchase on the financing date:

The warrants were valued at $33,583 and were recorded as a component of deferred financing costs. Interest expense related to the debentures amounted to $116,016 for the six- month period ended May 31, 2016. Of the $116,016, $84,146 related to accrued interest and the remaining $31,870 related to the amortization of deferred financing costs. Unamortized deferred financing costs as of May 31, 2016 consists of current costs of $63,741 (November 31, 2015: $63,741) and non- current costs of $11,497 (November 30, 2015: $43,367).

SECURITY DEVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
May 31, 2016
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

Inventory as of May 31, 2016 consist of finished goods of Blunt Impact Projectiles 40mm for $2,779 (November 30, 2015: $30,329) and 40mm LMT launchers for $10,479 (November 30, 2015: $13,990) which are held at the BIP manufacturer.

The Company is organized in two geographic areas in the U.S.A. and Canada respectively. The U.S.A. and Canada operations are our operating and reportable segments. Performance is assessed and resources are allocated by the Company. Management evaluates these segments based primarily upon revenue and assets. The tables below present segment sales and assets for the six months ended May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015.

On June 20, 2016, the Company announced that Gregory Sullivan will be resigning as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer effective July 15, 2016. Dean Thrasher, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer and a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, will assume the role of interim President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Sullivan also resigned as a director of the Company, effective upon the earlier of September 1, 2016, or until his successor is duly named and qualified.

The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of Security Devices International, Inc. (also referred to as "we", "us", "our", "SDI", or the "Company"), should be read in conjunction with the Company's financial statements (and related notes) as at November 30, 2015.

The following discussion contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause SDI’s results to differ materially from expectations. When reviewing the Company's forward-looking statements, investors and others should carefully consider the foregoing factors and other uncertainties and potential events. These include risk relating to market fluctuations, performance, , strength of the North American and other world economies and foreign exchange fluctuations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof. Unless otherwise required by applicable securities laws, the Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update these forward-looking statements. The Company does have an ongoing obligation to disclose material information as it becomes available. The discussion also includes cautionary statements about these matters. You should read the cautionary statements made below as being applicable to all forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this document.

Security Devices International Inc. (the “Company” or the “Corporation”) was incorporated on March 1, 2005. The Company began as a research and development company focused on the development of 40mm less-lethal ammunition.

The Company initiated with the development of a wireless electric projectile (the “WEP”), named the Lektrox. The Company hired a ballistics engineering firm to collaborate in the development of the WEP.

Commencing in December 2008, the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate (“JNLWD”) of the US Department of Defense, an organization responsible for the development and coordination of non-lethal weapons activities within the United States, tested the WEP through its evaluation facility at Penn State University. An executive summary was released to the Company indicating a positive outcome.

In the fall of 2010 the Company underwent a change in the board of directors and management.

Early in 2011 the Company focused its attention on a new 40mm product, the blunt impact projectile (“BIP”), and discontinued further development work on the WEP. The Company was able to exploit some of the patented technology of the WEP into the BIP. The Company concluded that the cost and time required to complete development and testing of the BIP were significantly less than that required to complete development and testing of the WEP.

In 2011, the Company moved its engineering, intellectual property and production facilities to the operator (the “BIP Manufacturer”) of an injection molding facility outside of Boston, Massachusetts.

In June 2012, the Company contracted CRT Less Lethal Inc. (“CRT”) to test the BIP. Based on data obtained from the three-stage evaluation, the BIP passed the CRT testing protocol for accuracy, consistency, relative safety and effectiveness.

In July 2012, the Company signed a five-year development, supply and manufacturing agreement with a subcontractor to Manufacture the BIP.

In November 2012, the Company obtained a United States Department of Transportation number (DOT#) required in order for the Company to ship BIP rounds.

In 2012, the Company began the development of five new less-lethal ammunition rounds. These new rounds will be a modified version of the BIP, four of which will carry a payload, including; BIP MP (temporary powder-based marking agent), BIP ML (semi-permanent liquid marking agent), BIP OC (Oleoresin Capsicum - a pepper spray powder), BIP MO (malodorant liquid), and the BIP TR (training round).

The Company moved its full manufacturing and supply chain operations to the BIP manufacturer, a supply manufacturing and engineering company, in the Boston, MA area.

The Company undertook an Initial Public Offering (IPO) in January and became a public reporting issuer on the TSX-Venture Exchange in September 2013.

SDI began another globally recognized testing protocol with a military agency called HECOE (the Human Effects Centre of Excellence). This world-renowned agency is located in the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), in partnership with the US Joint Non-lethal Weapons Directorate (JNLWD). This group conducts research to assist Non-lethal Weapon (NLW) Program Managers across the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) in assessing effectiveness and risks of NLWs. The positive conclusion of this testing allows DOD to purchase SDI rounds.

April - SDI appointed Keith Morrison to the board of directors as non-executive Chairman

May - SDI’s BIP rounds were used at the Mock Prison Riot in West Virginia. Law enforcement and correctional services officers provided feedback on new technologies (such as SDI’s products) to assist in the effectiveness of their jobs.

August - The Company completed the issuance of 1,549 convertible unsecured debentures at $1,000 per debenture for gross proceeds of $1,549,000 (the “Private Placement”).

October - Security Devices International Inc. announced that the Company and a division of Abrams Airborne Manufacturing Inc. (AAMI), namely Milkor USA (MUSA), have agreed to partner for a joint cross-selling / marketing initiative.

November - The Company named Karim Kanji to the board of directors as an independent member.

SDI has sold their BIP products into nine new agencies during the fiscal year of 2014 including Sheriff Departments, Correctional Services, and SWAT teams in; Saskatoon, SK, Watertown, SD, Abbotsford, BC, Sacramento, CA, Kingston, ON, Rustburg, VA, Orlando, FL, Montreal, QC, and Bedford, VA. These agencies are additions to SDI’s customer base that have adopted its 40mm less-lethal rounds.

In January 2015, SDI commenced a public relations program and through the year, SDI has been featured in over 700 media outlets globally, including live interviews on FOX television, News One in New York, and CP24 in Toronto.

March - SDI was invited to speak at the Launch festival in San Francisco, to present their innovative less-lethal technology during a panel discussion on the future of policing. The Launch festival focuses on start-up and emerging technology companies and the festival was streamed to approximately 4 million viewers.

During the second quarter, SDI attended the American Jail Association’s annual conference in North Carolina and performed a live fire demonstration to numerous State and local Agencies while in North Carolina.

During Q2, SDI also attended the Canadian Tactical Conference in Collingwood, Ontario as well as the New York Tactical Conference in Verona, New York.

Through SDI’s distributor (U.S. Tactical Supply– GSA) the Company was able to leverage their relationship to facilitate a live-fire demonstration for the Pentagon Protection Force in Alexandria, Virginia.

May - SDI participated in the “Mock Prison Riot” which takes place annually at a decommissioned penitentiary in Moundsville, West Virginia. The Mock Prison Riot is a four-day, comprehensive law enforcement and corrections tactical and technology experience, including 40,000 square feet of exhibit space, training scenarios, technology demonstrations, certification workshops, a Skills Competition, and unlimited opportunities for feedback and networking on a global scale.

SDI enhanced their customer base in the quarter by adding 9 new agencies in multiple States and Provinces both in Canada and the US.

SDI staff attended the Ohio Tactical officers conference in June where the Company not only had a full exhibit booth set up to bring awareness to SDI’s full line of less lethal 40MM products but also conducted live fire demonstrations to several agencies. These agencies had requested seeing the projectiles fired to move forward with evaluation of SDI’s products for potential inclusion in their less lethal arsenal.

July - SDI was invited to present the company’s full line of products to the New York City Police Department. Representatives of SDI attended the NYPD range and conducted in-class presentations followed by a live fire demonstration showcasing the full line on 40MM products that SDI can offer for Law Enforcement operational missions.

July - The Associated Press (“AP”), conducted interviews with SDI management and attended SDI’s manufacturing partners’ location for an in depth look at the company and the technology. The AP completed a story on the uniqueness of the product line and the increased element of safety that SDI’s products offer, and released the story to the newswire, where it was picked up by approximately 800 media outlets, worldwide.

August - SDI was invited to present to the Toronto Police Service (“TPS”), who are currently exploring less lethal options for front line officers. A full presentation was given to decision makers of the TPS and a follow-up live fire demonstration is to occur.

September – SDI conducted their Annual General Meeting and shareholders approved the following:

In FY2015, SDI added 24 new Law Enforcement and Correctional Agencies to its paid customer base. The Company as at fiscal yearend holds 40 agencies as customers.

In December 2015, SDI was invited to conduct a full product briefing and live fire demonstration for key Management with the United Sates Federal Bureau of Prisons. SDI was able to showcase the innovation of the BIP family of products and demonstrate the clear difference between SDI’s products and other products on the market.

In January 2016, SDI management attended the SHOT show in Las Vegas and met with numerous existing partners and explored future partnerships with several other Industry leaders.

During the SHOT show SDI’s rounds were used by AAMI, an existing partner of SDI, during a new product innovation range day that was attended by the majority of Companies in the firearms industry.

During Q1, SDI is pleased to announce that it received its first sale of 40MM launchers to a Law Enforcement Agency. This is an important step for SDI to be seen as having the availability to access other less lethal products to fulfil customer requests.

In January, SDI and Clyde Armoury, signed a distribution agreement whereas Clyde will offer SDI’s product line to Law Enforcement customers in their catchment area. Clyde is a full service gun store which supplies firearms, ammunition and accessories to Law Enforcement and Civilian customers. They are based in Athens, Georgia.

During this quarter, the non-exclusive renewable Technology License and Supply Agreement that was signed with United Tactical Solutions on April 17, 2015, was terminated by SDI management effective February 25, 2016.

On February 29, 2016, SDI signed a term sheet with an existing defense technology (less lethal) company to acquire that Company. This acquisition, if completed, will give SDI a diversified line of less lethal munitions, launchers and accessories as well as opening domestic and global distribution channels.

During the second quarter of 2016, the Company continued to pursue the targeted acquisition through several funding sources, and financing structures. Subsequent to the quarter, on July 8, 2016, the Company announced that it had identified a number of items in the target company’s (the “Target”) financial statements that raised concerns in support of the negotiated price of the transaction. SDI has terminated discussions with the Target at this time.

Subsequent to the quarter, the Company announced that Gregory Sullivan has resigned as President and CEO to pursue other opportunities, effective July 15, 2016. Dean Thrasher, the current COO and a member of the SDI board of directors will assume the interim role of President and CEO. Mr. Sullivan will remain on the board of directors until his replacement is appointed and receives stock exchange clearance, or September 1, 2016, whichever occurs first.

The Company signed a one-year consulting agreement with Northeast Industrial Partners LLP (“Northeast”), which is headed up by Mr. Bryan Ganz. Northeast will assist SDI with sales & marketing, expansion of the Company’s product range, review of operations, implementation of cost control measures, development of strategic alliances and financial oversight. Mr. Ganz brings more than 30 years of experience in sales management, manufacturing, new product design and development as well as mergers & acquisitions. During his career Mr. Ganz has bought, built and sold more than half a dozen global businesses with combined sales in excess of $1.0 billion. Most recently, Mr. Ganz sold Maine Industrial Tire LLC to Trelleborg (based out of Sweden), for $67 million generating a 7.0x return to investors over a three-year period.

For their services and subject to stock exchange approval, Northeast will be issued a value of US$200,000 in SDI stock in four quarterly instalments over the 12-month period ending May 15, 2017. The first quarterly instalment is due August 15, 2016. The stock will be priced at the volume weighted average trading price per common share over the 20-day period preceding the due date. The stock will vest at the end of the contract with Northeast.

NEIP is currently the controlling shareholder in two operating businesses and a 250-unit residential real estate portfolio in the New England area. Northeast also owns minority stakes in a number of public and private businesses including a California company developing wireless electricity. Mr. Ganz is a graduate of Columbia Law School in New York City and completed his accounting designation at Georgetown University in Washington DC.

The Company wishes to inform the market that a Schedule 13D was filed with the SEC on June 8, 2016 by SDI’s largest group of shareholders in the US, holding approximately 10,474,522 shares. The 13D filing by the “reporting persons” relates to the maximizing of shareholder value with the intention of engaging more substantively with management, the board of directors and other relevant parties on matters concerning the business, assets, capitalization, operations and strategy of SDI. The 13D filing says that the reporting person may also discuss strategic alternatives with interested parties to propose or consider extraordinary transactions including joint ventures, mergers or a sale transaction of the Company.

SDI’s business is the development, manufacture and sale of less-lethal ammunition. This ammunition is used by the military, correctional services, and police agencies for crowd control.

Five patent applications, four non-provisional and one provisional, have been filed by the Company with the U.S. Patent Office. The Patents have been granted on the four non-provisional patents.

(a) Less-lethal Projectile: This issued patent relates to the Company’s distinctive collapsible ammunition head technology that absorbs kinetic energy of the projectile upon impact. The Corporation’s collapsible head is used in both the BIP and the WEP.

(b) Electronic Circuitry for Incapacitating a Living Target: This issued patent relates to the electronic circuitry incapacitation system which forms part of the WEP. The patent describes an electronic circuit which provides an electrical incapacitation current to a living target.

(c) Less-lethal Wireless Stun Projectile System for Immobilizing a Target by Neuro-Muscular Disruption: This issued patent describes the process by which the WEP operates with its attachment system to halt a target through a neuro-muscular-disruption system.

(d) Autonomous Operation of a Less-lethal Projectile: This patent describes a motion sensing system within the WEP. The sensor will monitor movement of the target and enable the electrical output until the target is subdued. The electrical pulse is programmed for an exact time-frame to specifications of the user.

(e) Payload carrying arrangement for a non-lethal projectile: This Provisional patent relates to the process of carrying liquid and powder payloads in the head of the BIP munitions that upon impact release from the head and are dispersed upon the target.

The Company’s policy has been to write off cost incurred in connection with non-provisional and provisional patent costs as they are incurred as a recoverability of such expenditure is uncertain.

Police and military forces require easily applied options for riot control without the consequences of lethal force. They must balance the risk of injury or death to their own personnel against the risk of injury to civilians, including bystanders. Riot control involves difficult and challenging decisions that often must be made within seconds.

Conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, events such as the August 2011 UK riots, and the June 2012 Quebec student street violence have led governments, police and defense decision-makers, to seek cost effective less-lethal weapons. These decision-makers understand that social media will limit the use of lethal weapons and a new generation of less-lethal weapons is required.

Correctional Services facilities have suffered with the ability to control a subject without using excessive force. The Company’s product allows for a correctional officer to deploy a projectile at close range without harming the subject and still maintain protocol within their agency. In management’s opinion, the projectile suffices pain compliance on the subject, with properly followed safety precautions.

The following represents selected information of the Company for the most recently completed financial quarter ended May 31, 2016

SDI was incorporated on March 1, 2005 and for the period from inception to May 31, 2016 has not realized significant revenues. The company has started to generate revenue from operations. However, it still expects to incur expenses before becoming profitable.

Financial highlights (unaudited) for the three month and six- month period ending May 31, 2016 with comparatives are as follows:

The Company’s selected information for the six- month period ended May 31, 2016 (unaudited) and November 30, 2015 (audited) are as follows:

Net loss for the three months ended May 31, 2016 was $472,224 ($0.01 per share) as compared to $468,982 ($0.01 per share) for the three- month period ended May 31, 2015.

Net cash used in operations for the six months ended May 31, 2016, was $816,461 as compared to $908,650 used for the six months ended May 31, 2015. The major components of change relate to:

The Company’s inventory costs decreased by $31,061 in 2016 as compared to decrease of $28,794 in 2015. This decrease represents the investment in inventory available for sale in next period.

Net cash flow from investing activities reflects restricted cash for $2,500,000 in 2015 and $nil in 2016. During the prior period, the Company received cash for $2,500,000 in escrow relating to subscription for 7,575,757 common stock at a price of $0.33 (CAD $0.41) per share on a non-brokered private placement basis. The closing of the private placement was subject to approval of the new insider by the TSX-Venture Exchange, as required under stock exchange rules. The funds were thus considered restricted. Subsequent to the quarter ended May 31, 2015, the Company received approval from the TSX-Venture exchange.

Net Cash flow from financing activities was $2,500,000 in 2015 as compared to $nil in 2016. The increase in cash in prior period is explained above.

There was an overall decrease in cash and cash equivalent of $836,855 in 2016 as compared to a decrease in cash and cash equivalent of $920,280 during 2015.

As at May 31, 2016, cash and cash equivalent was $1,014,166, as compared to $1,851,021 at November 30, 2015. This decrease is mainly attributable to the combination of factors mentioned above under heading “Cash Flows”.

At May 31, 2016, the Company had a working capital of $1,047,983. The major components are as follows; cash and cash equivalent for $1,014,166; prepaid expenses and other receivables $33,947; Inventory for $13,258; deferred financing costs for $63,741; accounts receivable for $22,257 and accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $99,386.

At November 30, 2015, the Company had a working capital of $1,852,711. The major components are as follows; cash and cash equivalent $1,851,021; prepaid expenses and other receivables $27,283; Inventory for $44,319; deferred financing costs for $63,741; accounts receivable for $39,676; and accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $173,329.

The following transactions are in the normal course of operations and are measured at the exchange amount, which is the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.

The Company reimbursed $17,190 to directors and officers for travel and entertainment expenses incurred for the Company.

Six months ended May 31, 2015

The Company reimbursed $46,100 to directors and officers for travel and entertainment expenses incurred for the Company.

Compensation of Directors during the six- month period ended May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015.

The non-independent directors of the Company executed consulting agreements with the company on the following terms:

Effective May 1, 2016, the Company executed a one-year consulting agreement with a consultant who will assist the Company with sales & marketing, expansion of the Company’s product range, review of operations, implementation of cost control measures, development of strategic alliances and financial oversight. For the consultant services and subject to TSX Venture Exchange Inc. (the “Stock Exchange”) approval, the consultant will be paid cash of $50,000 and issued a value of $200,000 in Company’s stock in four quarterly installments over the 12-month period ending May 15, 2017. The first quarterly installment is due August 15, 2016. The stock will be priced at the volume weighted average trading price per common share over the 20- day period preceding the due date.

b) The Company has commitments for leasing office premises in Oakville, Ontario, Canada to April 30, 2018 at a monthly rent of $4,800 (CAD $6,399).

The Company’s revenue recognition policies follow common practice in the manufacturing industry. The Company records revenue when it is realized, or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue to be realized, or realizable and earned, when the following revenue recognition requirements are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; the products or services have been accepted by the customer via delivery or installation acceptance; the sales price is fixed or determinable; and collectability is probable. For product sales, the Company determines that the earnings process is complete when title, risk of loss and the right to use product has transferred to the customer.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company had 54,615,642 issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

The Corporation does not have adequate revenue to fund all of its operational needs and may require additional financing to continue its operations if it is unable to generate substantial revenue growth. There can be no assurance that such financing will be available at all or on favorable terms. Failure to generate substantial revenue growth may result in the Corporation looking to obtain such additional financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of the Corporation’s deployment of its products, resulting in the possible dilution. Any such financing will dilute the ownership interest of the Corporation’s shareholders at the time of the financing, and may dilute the value of their shareholdings.

The Common Shares must be considered highly speculative due to the nature of the Corporation’s business, the early stage of its deployment, its current financial position and ongoing requirements for capital. An investment in the Common Shares should only be considered by those persons who can afford a total loss of investment, and is not suited to those investors who may need to dispose of their investment in a timely fashion. Investors should consult with their own professional advisors to assess the legal, financial and other aspects of an investment in Common Shares.

There can be no assurance that the Corporation can generate substantial revenue growth, or that any revenue growth that is achieved can be sustained. Revenue growth that the Corporation has achieved or may achieve may not be indicative of future operating results. In addition, the Corporation may increase further its operating expenses in order to fund increase its sales and marketing efforts and increase its administrative resources in anticipation of future growth. To the extent that increases in such expenses precede or are not subsequently followed by increased revenues, the Corporation’s business, operating results and financial condition will be materially adversely affected.

The Corporation is dependent on certain members of its management. The loss of the services of one or more of them could adversely affect the Corporation. The Corporation’s ability to maintain its competitive position is dependent upon its ability to attract and retain highly qualified managerial, specialized technical, manufacturing, sales and marketing personnel. There can be no assurance that the Corporation will be able to continue to recruit and retain such personnel. The inability of the Corporation to recruit and retain such personnel would adversely affect the Corporation’s operations and product development.

The Corporation may be able to purchase certain key components of its products from a limited number of suppliers. Failure of a supplier to provide sufficient quantities on favorable terms or on a timely basis could result in possible lost sales.

The Corporation may be subject to proceedings or claims that may arise in the ordinary conduct of the business, which could include product and service warranty claims, which could be substantial. If its products fail to perform as warranted and it fails to quickly resolve product quality or performance issues in a timely manner, sales may be lost and it may be forced to pay damages. Any failure to meet customer requirements could materially affect its business, results of operations and financial condition. The occurrence of product defects and the inability to correct errors could result in the delay or loss of market acceptance of its products, material warranty expense, diversion of technological and other resources from its product development efforts, and the loss of credibility with customers, manufacturer’s representatives, distributors, value added resellers, systems integrators, original equipment manufacturers and end-users, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s business, operating results and financial conditions.

The Corporation currently has general liability insurance that includes product liability coverage. There is no assurance this insurance policy will cover all potential claims which may have a material adverse effect on the business or financial condition of the Corporation. A product recall could have a material adverse effect on the business or financial condition of the Corporation.

The Corporation relies upon, and expects to rely upon, strategic alliances with original equipment manufacturers for the manufacturing and distribution of its products. There can be no assurance that such strategic alliances can be achieved or will achieve their goals.

In order to commercialize its technology, the Corporation must either acquire or develop an internal marketing and sales force with technical expertise and with supporting distribution capabilities or arrange for third parties to perform these services. In order to market any of its products, the Corporation must either acquire or develop a sales and distribution infrastructure. The acquisition or development of a sales and distribution infrastructure would require substantial resources, which may divert the attention of its Management and key personnel, and defer its product development and deployment efforts. To the extent that the Corporation enters into marketing and sales arrangements with other companies, its revenues will depend on the efforts of others. These efforts may not be successful. If the Corporation fails to develop substantial sales, marketing and distribution channels, or to enter into arrangements with third parties for those purposes, it will experience delays in product sales and incur increased costs.

The markets for the Corporation’s products and services are characterized by rapidly changing technology and evolving industry standards, which could result in product obsolescence or short product life cycles. Accordingly, the Corporation’s success is dependent upon its ability to anticipate technological changes in the industries it serves and to successfully identify, obtain, develop and market new products that satisfy evolving industry requirements. There can be no assurance that the Corporation will successfully develop new products or enhance and improve its existing products or that any new products and enhanced and improved existing products will achieve market acceptance. Further, there can be no assurance that competitors will not market products that have perceived advantages over the Corporation’s products or which render the products currently sold by the Corporation obsolete or less marketable. Regardless of the Industry as a whole, the less lethal sector moves somewhat slower in the adaptation and integration of new products.

The Corporation must commit significant resources to developing new products before knowing whether its investments will result in products the market will accept. To remain competitive, the Corporation may be required to invest significantly greater resources then currently anticipated in research and development and product enhancement efforts, and result in increased operating expenses.

The Corporation’s industry is highly competitive and composed of many domestic and foreign companies. The Corporation has experienced and expects to continue to experience, substantial competition from numerous competitors whom it expects to continue to improve their products and technologies. Competitors may announce and introduce new products, services or enhancements that better meet the needs of end-users or changing industry standards, or achieve greater market acceptance due to pricing, sales channels or other factors. Competitors may be able to respond more quickly than the Corporation to changes in end-user requirements and devote greater resources to the enhancement, promotion and sale of their products.

The Corporation is subject to numerous federal, provincial, state and local environmental, health and safety legislation and measures relating to the manufacture of ammunition. There can be no assurance that the Corporation will not experience difficulties with its efforts to comply with applicable regulations as they change in the future or that its continued compliance efforts (or failure to comply with applicable requirements) will not have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s results of operations, business, prospects and financial condition. The Corporation’s continued compliance with present and changing future laws could restrict the Corporation’s ability to modify or expand its facilities or continue production and could require the Corporation to acquire costly equipment or to incur other significant expense.

The Corporation’s ability to compete effectively will depend, in part, on its ability to maintain the proprietary nature of its technology and manufacturing processes. Although the Corporation considers certain of its product designs as well as manufacturing processes involving certain of its products to be proprietary, patents or copyrights do not protect all design and manufacturing processes. The Corporation has adopted procedures to protect its intellectual property and maintain secrecy of its confidential business information and trade secrets. However, there can be no assurance that such procedures will afford complete protection of such intellectual property, confidential business information and trade secrets. There can be no assurance that the Corporation’s competitors will not independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to the Corporation’s technology.

To protect the Corporation’s intellectual property, it may become involved in litigation, which could result in substantial expenses, divert the attention of its management, cause significant delays and materially disrupt the conduct of its business.

While the Corporation believes that its products and other intellectual property do not infringe upon the proprietary rights of third parties, its commercial success depends, in part, upon the Corporation not infringing intellectual property rights of others. A number of the Corporation’s competitors and other third parties have been issued or may have filed patent applications or may obtain additional patents and proprietary rights for technologies similar to those utilized by the Corporation. Some of these patents may grant very broad protection to the owners of the patents. The Corporation has not undertaken a review to determine whether any existing third party patents or the issuance of any third party patents would require the Corporation to alter its technology, obtain licenses or cease certain activities. The Corporation may become subject to claims by third parties that its technology infringes their intellectual property rights due to the growth of products in its target markets, the overlap in functionality of those products and the prevalence of products. The Corporation may become subject to these claims either directly or through indemnities against these claims that it provides to end-users, manufacturer’s representatives, distributors, value added resellers, system integrators and original equipment manufacturers.

Litigation may be necessary to determine the scope, enforceability and validity of third party proprietary rights or to establish the Corporation’s proprietary rights. Some of its competitors have, or are affiliated with companies having, substantially greater resources than the Corporation and these competitors may be able to sustain the costs of complex intellectual property litigation to a greater degree and for a longer period of time than the Corporation. Regardless of their merit, any such claims could be time consuming to evaluate and defend, result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays or stoppages, divert management’s attention and focus away from the business, subject the Corporation to significant liabilities and equitable remedies, including injunctions, require the Corporation to enter into costly royalty or licensing agreements and require the Corporation to modify or stop using infringing technology.

The Corporation may be prohibited from developing or commercializing certain technologies and products unless it obtains a license from a third party. There can be no assurance that it will be able to obtain any such license on commercially favorable terms or at all. If it does not obtain such a license, it could be required to cease the sale of certain of its products.

Health and safety issues related to its products may arise that could lead to litigation or other action against the Corporation or to regulation of certain of its product components. The Corporation may be required to modify its technology and may not be able to do so. It may also be required to pay damages that may reduce its profitability and adversely affect its financial condition. Even if these concerns prove to be baseless, the resulting negative publicity could affect the Corporation’s ability to market certain of its products and, in turn, could harm its business and results from operations.

Stress in the global financial system may adversely affect the Corporation’s operations in ways that may be hard to predict or to defend against

Recent events have demonstrated that businesses and industries throughout the world are very tightly connected to each other. Thus, events seemingly unrelated to the Corporation, or to its industry, may adversely affect its finances or operations in ways that are hard to predict or defend against. For example, credit contraction in financial markets may hurt the Corporation’s ability to access credit when it is needed or rapid changes in foreign exchange rates may adversely affect financial results. Finally, a reduction in credit, combined with reduced economic activity, may adversely affect businesses and industries that collectively constitute a significant portion of the Corporation’s customer base. As a result, these customers may need to reduce their purchases of the Corporation’s products, or there may be greater difficulty in receiving payment for the products that these customers purchase from the Corporation. Any of these events, or any other events caused by turmoil in world financial markets, may have a material adverse effect on the business, operating results, and financial condition.

The Corporation’s business is subject to a number of risks and hazards including industrial accidents, labor disputes and changes in the regulatory environment. Such occurrences could result in damage to equipment, personal injury or death, monetary losses and possible legal liability. Although the Corporation maintains liability insurance in amounts which it considers adequate, the nature of these risks is such that liabilities might exceed policy limits, the liabilities and hazards might not be insurable, or the Corporation may elect not to insure against such liabilities due to high premium costs or other reasons, in which event the Corporation could incur significant costs that could have a materially adverse effect upon its financial position.

Certain directors and officers of the Corporation are or may become associated with other companies in the same or related industries which may give rise to conflicts of interest. Directors who have a material interest in any person who is a party to a material contract or a proposed material contract with the Corporation are required, subject to certain exceptions, to disclose that interest and generally abstain from voting on any resolution to approve the contract. In addition, the directors and the officers are required to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Corporation. The directors and officers of the Corporation have either other full-time employment or other business or time restrictions placed on them and accordingly, the Corporation will not be the only business enterprise of these directors and officers.

The Corporation has not paid dividends in the past and has no plans to pay dividends for the foreseeable future. The future dividend policy of the Corporation will be determined by its directors.

There can be no assurance that an active market for the Common Shares will continue and any increased demand to buy or sell the Common Shares can create volatility in price and volume.

There can be no assurance that an active market for the Common Shares will be sustained. Securities of small and midcap companies have experienced substantial volatility in the past, often based on factors unrelated to the financial performance or prospects of the companies involved. These factors include global economic developments and market perceptions of the attractiveness of certain industries. The price per Common Share is also likely to be affected by change in the Corporation’s financial condition or results of operations as reflected in its quarterly filings. Other factors unrelated to the performance of the Corporation that may have an effect on the price of Common Shares include the following: the extent of analytical coverage available to subscribers concerning the business of the Corporation may be limited if investment banks with research capabilities do not follow the Corporation’s securities; lessening in trading volume and general market interest in the Corporation’s securities may affect a subscriber’s ability to trade significant numbers of Common Shares, the size of the Corporation’s public float may limit the ability of some institutions to invest in the Corporation’s securities; a substantial decline in the price of the Common Shares that persists for a significant period of time could cause the Corporation’s securities to be delisted from the exchange, further reducing market liquidity. If an active market for the Common Shares does not continue, the liquidity of a subscriber’s investment may be limited and the price of the Common Shares may decline. If such a market does not develop, subscribers may lose their entire investment in the Common Shares.

Any changes in government policy may result in changes to laws affecting the sale of the Corporation’s products. This may affect the Corporation’s ability to ship product in the future. The possibility that future governments may adopt substantially different policies, may also effect the Corporation’s operations. Local governments in all countries the Corporation deals with issue end user certificates to purchase or receive live ammunition from the Corporation. It is the decision of these countries in the Middle East, the United States, Canada, Europe, and the Baltics whether or not they will take possession or purchase such munitions.

The Corporation has not, since the date of its incorporation, declared or paid any dividends on its Common Shares and does not currently intend to pay dividends. Earnings, if any, will be retained to finance further growth and development of the business of the Corporation.

In November of 2013, a former officer filed a law suit against the Company in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Province of Ontario) seeking, among other things, $60,000 in damages for wrongful dismissal, damages of $35,000 on account of vacation pay and damages to be determined for out of pocket expenses, breach of contract, unjust enrichment and loss of business opportunity. During the quarter ended February 28, 2015, the Company and the former officer executed a settlement agreement at CAD $15,000.

(a) SDI maintains a system of controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“1934 Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by SDI in the reports that it files or submits under the 1934 Act, is accumulated and communicated to SDI’s management, including its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of May 31, 2016, SDI’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of SDI’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, SDI’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that SDI’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to the following material weakness:

Inherent in any small business is the pervasive problem involving segregation of duties. Since SDI has a small accounting department, segregation of duties cannot be completely accomplished at this stage in its corporate lifecycle.

In order to correct the foregoing material weakness, we have taken and are taking the following remediation measures that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting:

Accordingly, SDI’s management has added compensating controls to reduce and minimize the risk of a material misstatement in SDI’s annual and interim financial statements.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls. There were no changes in SDI’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended May 31, 2016 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Delaware	71-1050654
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

Larger accelerated filer [ ]	Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ]	Smaller reporting company [X]

	Page
	No

Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets as at May 31, 2016 and November 30, 2015	1

Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive loss for the six months and three months ended May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015	2

Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015	3

Interim Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency) for the six months ended May 31, 2016 and year ended November 30, 2015.	4

Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements	5-14

	May 31,		November 30,
	2016		2015
	(unaudited)		(audited)
	$		$
ASSETS

CURRENT
Cash and cash equivalent	1,014,166		1,851,021
Accounts Receivable	22,257		39,676
Inventory (Note 10)	13,258		44,319
Deferred financing costs (Note 9)	63,741		63,741
Prepaid expenses and other receivables	33,947		27,283

Total Current Assets	1,147,369		2,026,040
Deferred financing costs (Note 9)	11,497		43,367
Property and Equipment (Note 3)	73,753		97,011

TOTAL ASSETS	1,232,619		2,166,418

LIABILITIES
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	99,386		173,329
Total Current Liabilities	99,386		173,329
Convertible Debentures (Note 9)	1,398,592		1,398,592

Total Liabilities	1,497,978		1,571,921
Going Concern (Note 2)
Related Party Transactions (Note 6)
Commitments (Note 7)
Segment Disclosures (Note 11)
Subsequent Events (Note 12)

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

Capital Stock (Note 4)
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, Nil issued and outstanding (2015 - nil).
Common stock, $0.001 par value 100,000,000 shares authorized (2015: 100,000,000), 54,615,642 issued and outstanding (2015: 54,615,642)	54,616		54,616
Additional Paid-In Capital	27,179,827		27,179,827
Deficiency	(27,445,233	)	(26,593,207	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(54,569	)	(46,739	)

Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficiency)	(265,359	)	594,497
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)	1,232,619		2,166,418

	For the		For the		For the		For the
	six		six		three		three
	months		months		months		months
	ended		ended		ended		ended
	May 31,		May 31,		May 31,		May 31,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
	$		$		$		$

SALES	52,222		74,605		21,719		38,073
COST OF SALES	(32,337	)	(59,568	)	(11,703	)	(24,720	)
GROSS PROFIT	19,885		15,037		10,016		13,353

EXPENSES:
Depreciation	23,258		23,583		11,629		11,792
General and administration	732,637		833,547		412,286		412,218
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES	755,895		857,130		423,915		424,010
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS	(736,010	)	(842,093	)	(413,899	)	(410,657	)
Other expense- Interest (Note 9)	(116,016	)	(115,382)		(58,325	)	(58,325)
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES	(852,026	)	(957,475	)	(472,224	)	(468,982	)
Income taxes	-		-		-		-
NET LOSS	(852,026	)	(957,475	)	(472,224	)	(468,982	)
Foreign exchange translation adjustment for the period	(7,830	)	(6,840	)	(4,212	)	4,385
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS	(859,856	)	(964,315	)	(476,436	)	(464,597	)
Loss per share - basic and diluted	(0.02	)	(0.02	)	(0.01	)	(0.01	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding	54,615,642		46,899,285		54,615,642		46,899,285

Computer equipment	30%	declining balance method
Furniture and Fixtures	30%	declining balance method
Leasehold Improvements		straight line over period of lease
Moulds	20%	straight line over 5 years

		May 31, 2016			November 30, 2015
			Accumulated			Accumulated
		Cost	Amortization		Cost	Amortization
		$	$		$	$
Computer equipment		37,573	34,947		37,573	34,483
Furniture and fixtures		18,027	16,352		18,027	16,057
Leasehold Improvements		23,721	17,791		23,721	16,244
Moulds		209,515	145,993		209,515	125,041
		288,836	215,083		288,836	191,825

Net carrying amount	$		73,753	$		97,011

Depreciation expense	$		23,258 (6months)			47,165 (12 months)

Risk free rate		2.00%
Expected dividends		0%
Forfeiture rate		0%
Volatility		17.29% to 134.39%
Warrant modification expense	$	216,684

Convertible Debentures - Face Value	$	1,398,342
Proceeds	$	(1,279,773	)
Deferred financing costs		(190,876	)
Paid in capital (warrants)		33,583
Prepaid expenses		16,681
Accrued expenses		21,793
Convertible debentures		1,398,592

Sales

		SDI		SDI Canada		Total
Six months ended May 31, 2016	$	27,091	$	25,131	$	52,222

Six months ended May 31, 2015	$	13,772	$	60,833	$	74,605

		2016			2015
Total Sales	$	71,778		$	133,410
Elimination of intersegment revenue		(19,556	)		(58,805	)

Net sales	$	52,222			74,605

Assets

		SDI		SDI Canada		Total
Six months ended May 31, 2016	$	1,009,654	$	222,965	$	1,232,619

Six months ended May 31, 2015	$	3,008,787	$	47,979	$	3,056,766

	1)	The Board of Directors, as it stands today, was re-elected.
	2)	Schwartz Levitsky Feldman, LLP was re-appointed as SDI’s auditors.
	3)	Approval of an amendment to Company’s by-laws concerning the quorum required to hold a meeting of shareholders.
	4)	Approval of the Company’s incentive stock option plan.
	5)	Approval of an amendment to the Company’s articles to prohibit the issuance of shares of preferred stock having multiple voting attributes.

	a)	The Company has developed the BIP, a blunt impact projectile which uses pain compliance to control a target. The Company has developed six versions of the standard BIP, five of which contain a payload and one of which is a cheaper cost, training round. A payload is an internal medium within the BIP, holding a liquid or powder substance.

	b)	The Company has undertaken substantial work to develop the WEP, a wireless electric projective which releases an electrical pulse that induces a muscle spasm and causes the target to fall to the ground helpless.

	•	As of May 31, 2016, SDI had consultants and no full-time employees.
	•	SDI’s offices are located at 25 Sawyer Passway, Fitchburg, Massachusetts, 01420 and 125 Lakeshore Road East, Unit 300, Oakville, Ontario L6J 1H3 Canada. SDI rents its Ontario office at a cost of CAN $6,399 per month pursuant to a lease which expires on April 30, 2018. SDI maintains an office within the Micron manufacturing facility under an agreement with Micron, with no lease cost to SDI.
	•	SDI’s website is www.securitydii.com.

	Three- month		Three- month
	period		period
	May 31,		May 31,
	2016		2015
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)


Net loss for the three- month period	472,224		468,982
Basic and diluted loss per share	(0.01	)	(0.01	)

	As at	As at
	May 31,	November
	2016	30, 2015
Total assets	1,232,619	2,166,418

Total liabilities	1,497,978	1,571,921
Cash dividends per share	-	-

Operating Results	For the three months		For the three months
	ended		ended
	May 31,		May 31,
	2016		2015
	$		$
Sales	21,719		38,073
Cost of sales	(11,703	)	(24,720	)
Gross Profit	10,016		13,353
Operating Expenses	(423,915	)	(424,010	)
Other expenses -Interest	(58,325	)	(58,325	)
Net Loss for Period	(472,224	)	(468,982	)

(Loss) per Share	($0.01	)	($0.01	)

Operating Results	For the six months		For the six months
	ended		ended
	May 31,		May 31,
	2016		2015
	$		$
Sales	52,222		74,605
Cost of sales	(32,337	)	(59,568	)
Gross Profit	19,885		15,037
Operating Expenses	(755,895	)	(857,130	)
Other expenses -Interest	(116,016	)	(115,382	)
Net Loss for Period	(852,026	)	(957,475	)

(Loss) per Share	($0.02	)	($0.02	)

				Awards of
				Options
				or
		Paid/Payable	Stock	Warrants
Non-Independent Directors		in Cash	Awards	(2)
Gregory Sullivan	$	67,825	--	-
Allen Ezer	$	41,455	--	-
Dean Thrasher (1)	$	107,200	--	-

Independent Directors
Keith Morrison	$	-	-	-
David Goodbrand	$	-	-	-
Karim Kanji	$	42,200	-	-

(1)	Mr. Thrasher is contracted through Level 4 Capital Corp., a company in which Mr. Thrasher owns a 50% interest

(2)	The fair value of options or warrants granted computed in accordance with ASC 718 on the date of grant.

(1)	Boaz Dor resigned in year 2013
(2)	Mr. Thrasher is contracted through Level 4 Capital Corp., a company in which Mr. Thrasher owns a 50% interest
(3)	The fair value of options or warrants granted computed in accordance with ASC 718 on the date of grant.

	•	We have several Directors with business experience and spending time with the business.
	•	We have established an audit committee of our board of directors. The audit committee will provide oversight of our accounting and financial reporting;
	•	We have a Chief Financial Officer who has knowledge of, and experience regarding, U.S. GAAP and SEC reporting requirements.

31.1	Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Gregory Sullivan.

31.2	Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Rakesh Malhotra.

32.1	Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Gregory Sullivan and Rakesh Malhotra.

	By: /s/ Gregory Sullivan
	Gregory Sullivan, President
	and Principal Executive Officer

	By: /s/ Rakesh Malhotra
	Rakesh Malhotra, Principal
	Financial and Accounting Officer